Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Compucorp 322G Scientist BW 2024-02-22 18-21-02 Stack.jpg

Image:Compucorp 322G Scientist BW 2024-02-22 18-21-02 Stack.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2024 at 16:05:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Compucorp 322G Scientist BW 2024-02-22 18-21-02 Stack.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Compucorp 322G Scientist BW 2024-02-22 18-21-02 Stack.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment There are several aquamarine hot pixels to the right of the middle of the calculator. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

  I can't see hotpixels at 200% view. (Perhaps i need new glasses or a new screen) --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

• I can count 5 of them. I'll try to mark them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

• And I'm now noticing even more of them, another 5 that are a pale light brown and harder to see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:41, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek I removed them + some cleaning. --Mile (talk) 09:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

• It's not letting me add image notes. Look to the right of "2ND FUNC" and "Ln LOG." The light green hot pixels are above and to the right of the pale tan hot pixels, and both sets of hot pixels have the same shape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment The pen does not look to be the same era as the machine. Is it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

  I was thinking the same Wilfredor (talk) 01:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

  No, the pen ist new. It's there as size comparison and having subtle colours (or non-colors) --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

   Oppose the pen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support I find Charles's argument persuasive but also I think this is really good, well composed, attractive 'product' photography Cmao20 (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 16:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 18:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 21:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the edits. Very good photo of an interesting product. The pen is OK with me, but some text like "pen manufactured c. 2024 (or whatever) included for size comparison" would address any concerns about any anachronism. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment The light in the background is a bit strange, and I don't understand either the pen. Why that? is it supposed to be used to press the keys? Poco a poco (talk) 08:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality photo of the calculator, but the pen is odd and throws off the composition (too heavily weighted to the right). Doesn't have the FP wow for me, sorry. BigDom (talk) 01:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Guess that the pen was added as kind of a scale – without it I would have underestimated the size of that calculator. --Aristeas (talk) 13:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines