Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg

File:Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2011 at 20:58:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg

•  Info created by Unknown - uploaded by Jengod - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 20:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 20:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good quality, but since it is 1.7 megapixels I am a bit undecided.--Snaevar (talk) 14:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Changed to  Oppose. Basically the same reasoning as before.--Snaevar (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- 212.241.58.17 15:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Please log in to vote -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small. W.S. 15:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment The picture is large enough to be a featured picture candidate. Thank you, --патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 15:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

• No it isn't: it is below 2 Mpx. If Tomas hadn't supported already, I would have FPX'ed it. W.S. 15:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

 Info As I have pointed out many times over the years, there is no arbitary size limit of 2Mpx (there is a guideline to help submitters) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

 Support I agree with your philosophy that there's no real need to have strict size rules. Some minor and well-justified deviations IMO are worth considering. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 23:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too small--shizhao (talk) 13:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)