Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clematis hybrid Rouge Cardinal.jpg

File:Clematis hybrid Rouge Cardinal.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2010 at 13:04:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Clematis hybrid Rouge Cardinal.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clematis hybrid Rouge Cardinal.jpg

•  Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support great composition --AngMoKio (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 15:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I find the pic too 'flat' to look good; looks like a cut flower lying on top of a heap of cut leaves, rather than a "real" whole plant. - MPF (talk) 19:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 01:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Good picture - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 09:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition may be good, but this is not the naturally look of a clematis plant. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
• Temporary  Oppose Berthold has a good point .. can you clear it ?   • Richard • [®] • 11:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Here you can see the other images of the Clematis „Rouge Cardinal“ in wikimedia commons. I think, the „naturally look“ of these three images helps them not to a scientific value. There colors and the details of the flower and the leafes are not punctilious. With such images you can’t describe, classify, identify and name the species „Rouge Cardinal“. I used a new way to preserve the naturally form and colors of the „Rouge Cardinal“ with scientific value and to find an alternative to the preserved plant specimens in the herbarium. I scanned the „Rouge Cardinal“ and made this large and sharp image with subtly differentiated natural colors und a large depth of field. I think this image in wikimedia commons will be used in the plant taxonomy. Gratulation, MPF, you saw what happened to the „Rouge Cardinal“, but now you know why I did it this way. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 Comment Ich erkläre mal auf deutsch was mich stört. Es ging mir weniger um die Farben, da gibt es von der Clematis so viele Züchtungen, dass wohl alle Farben vorkommen. Aber kann kann auf deinem Fotos eben nicht erkennen wie die Pflanze aussieht. Es ist ja eine Rankplanze bei der die Blätter nicht so zusammenstehen wie auf dem Foto. Auch sitzen die Blüten nicht so auf den Blättern auf. Jemand der keine Clematis kennt, erhält so einen ganz falschen Eindruck von der Pflanze. Desweiteren erscheint mir auch die Beleuchtung zu frontal. Deshalb meine Ablehnung (und ich denke deshalb auch die Ablehnung vom MPF), andere sehen das anders, deshalb gibt's ja eine Abstimmung darüber. Sorry, my english is not so good to explain this in english. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose Berthold explained it well. Lycaon (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose looks too flat. Snowmanradio (talk) 23:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 07:07, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:26, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:41, 12 July 2010 (UTC)