Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clear water of Piges Krias (Πηγές Κρύας).jpg

File:Clear water of Piges Krias (Πηγές Κρύας).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2019 at 00:29:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Clear water of Piges Krias (Πηγές Κρύας).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clear water of Piges Krias (Πηγές Κρύας).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info A picture I found unique. created by Andreas P - uploaded by Andreas P - nominated by Andreas P –Aνδρέας ^{talk | contributions} 00:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support –Aνδρέας ^{talk | contributions} 00:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I guessed before checking that this was a smartphone photo. The quality of the picture, which is well below FP quality, tipped it off. It's a good smartphone pic, but that's not the standard here. Blown highlights, and the water should look sharper for an FP. Aside from that, the scene is certainly nice but the composition isn't particularly outstanding for this type of subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Harsh light, and per Ikan Kekek -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile – poor quality, harsh light, and cluttered composition. Not even QI for me. The nominator should keep in mind that FPC is about labeling the very best images there are on Commons. While the clear water is nice, it covers but a small part of the frame and is mostly in deep shadow; the composition does not draw the viewer’s attention towards the subject. I really can’t see any outstanding or excellent photographic work here to place this image among our very best. --Kreuzschnabel 06:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's pretty and I like the clear water, but I disagree that it's especially unique. You can go to any number of towns and find a stream like this to take a snap of. The image quality is not very good, as expected from a smartphone photo, which rarely produce sufficient quality for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 10:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is certainly a nice spot but the technical limits of a smartphone photo are evident here. --Dinkum (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others--Boothsift Is Here 02:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: issues mentioned above --Kreuzschnabel 18:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.