Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church st. Arhangel Mihail in Radozda.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Church st. Arhangel Mihail in Radozda.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 00:17:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Anita.Palceska - uploaded by Anita.Palceska - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)- Support - This is a really unusual sight and it's sharp enough, so I, too, think we should feature it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
{{o}} it´s clearly tilted to the left, even when the niche on the right seems straight. I would reconsider to neutral, if it would be changed. I am not really convinced about the sharpness. --Hubertl 06:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)- @Hubertl: Can you please be more specific about the tilt? I don't see any tilt to the left, not just because of the niche on the right, but also because of the lines of the door that are parallel to the frame. I don't want to make any fixes before I know the magnitude of the tilt you're talking about.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment There is nothing parallel at all except the base line of the small building in the niche. --Hubertl 11:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Hubertl: Can you please be more specific about the tilt? I don't see any tilt to the left, not just because of the niche on the right, but also because of the lines of the door that are parallel to the frame. I don't want to make any fixes before I know the magnitude of the tilt you're talking about.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:03, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Oppose As Hubertl said. --Mile (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)- Comment I've fixed the tilt and uploaded the new version.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I reworked it again, because with your tool you lost too much from the right side and the bottom. --Hubertl 18:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 18:14, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support looks ok now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support it´s ok now. --Hubertl 06:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Nice place, nice shot.--Jebulon (talk) 13:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
