Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ChryslerValiant-Gardey1.jpg

File:ChryslerValiant-Gardey1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2023 at 22:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:ChryslerValiant-Gardey1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ChryslerValiant-Gardey1.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
•  Info created/uploaded/nominated by --Ezarateesteban 22:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose A nice enough image but it doesn't seem to have any "wow factor". There's nothing special that makes the image stand out. It's just a still image of a parked car. --Peulle (talk) 07:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice effect, but a lot of disturbing elements in the background. --XRay 💬 08:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Good idea, but the car was not carefully enough selected or isolated. Also, there are left color fragments in the b&w area. The editing would have to be redone from scratch with a more appealing framing. This is just a constructive proposal. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment background now less distracting Ezarateesteban 23:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

• Much more distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose This version with an artificially blurred background is worse than the previous one. Look at the wheels that seem to float in space. And the technical work was awkwardly handled all around. Through the glass the contrast makes no sense, this way -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I totally agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad idea, poorly executed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Unfortunately, the editing was not as successful as it was intended. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Sadly, I have to agree: this edit was unsuccessful and made the result much worse. Making the background blurry was anything but beneficial. My suggestion for improvement was, that you should have freed the car more carefully to make the b&w background stand out more convincingly, and not blur the background artificially. Unfortunately, I could not respond to your comment before because I was several days on the road. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)