Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chiesa San Pietro in Oliveto navata Brescia.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Chiesa San Pietro in Oliveto navata Brescia.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2019 at 21:19:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the San Pietro in Oliveto church in Brescia.
  •  Oppose per Basile Morin: This almost-but-not-quite symmetrical composition does not work for me at all. It immediately makes me wonder: what was so ugly about the right side that it had to be hidden? In addition to that, most of the image consists of either ceiling or benches, neither of which are particularly interesting. The altar area is interesting as you zoom in, but looking at the image as a whole, it is hidden far away in the back. Maybe a longer lens with more "compression" would have worked better? --El Grafo (talk) 08:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I'm going to be honest, I thought a chunk of the picture was missing because I first looked at it on my phone. That's how much unappealing I find it. If at least the crop made it clear what to focus on... but not even that. Aside, it's also a bit noisy (though not a FP killer, but should be easy to avoid given the favorable conditions). - Benh (talk) 18:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry, I know you like these off-centre compositions and I've voted for them in the past but this one is just too strange for me. The image quality is great, and I get your argument about it including the Cornu Evangelii and not duplicating identical information, but to me the nave of a church is a subject that simply demands to be shot symmetrically. I would actually be happy to support it if you produced a symmetrical crop to cut off the left-hand side, as what we'd have left would still be interesting enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 23:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose entirely per El Grafo. Of course detail is impressive but size isn’t everything, and the not-quite-symmetrical composition is really disturbing. --Kreuzschnabel 11:44, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]