Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chaunax stigmaeus dorsal view2.jpg

File:Chaunax stigmaeus dorsal view2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2011 at 14:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chaunax stigmaeus dorsal view2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chaunax stigmaeus dorsal view2.jpg

•  Info created by Dr. Steve Ross - uploaded & nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Citron (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice modification! -- Marmoulak (talk) 20:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image quality, great encyclopedic value. -- MJJR (talk) 22:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 22:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good quality, but the modification reduced the encyclopedic value, since now the size is no longer apparent. Plus, a white background is more friendly to printers and IMO also to the eyes. --Nikopol (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

The measure was cut by the edge of the image, I would have been criticized for letting it. You can add a scale if you want. For the white background, you're right, but did you know that white background consumes more electricity with your computer? And the black background brings out the fish that is mostly clear. --Citron (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Some clipping errors (right side of the lip and left fin). The distance of the frame should be about the same everywhere that is not the case for the left. But all that is minor. The educational value should take precedence over everything. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--shizhao (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice quality. @Nikopol: Black background is monitor friendly, and IMO eye friendly. A white background version for printing could be easily generated if needed. --Elekhh (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - cool. Jonathunder (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish