Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapiteau Grenade.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chapiteau Grenade.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2010 at 20:26:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by -- Jebulon (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Jebulon (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Croucrou (talk) 21:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing special --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Question please, what do you mean with nothing special ?----Jebulon (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Um, well, take a guess? This doesn't really have any educational or artistic value IMO. It would probably make a QI though. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well well well... It is just what I was afraid of. 1) This picture is still a QI (not would probably make, see point 2). 2) "take a guess" is unnecessary contemptuous. 3) Your opinion about non educational value of this image could maybe be corrected with a very short study of the multi secular history of Europe, and of the history of relationship between Islam and Christianity, which seems to be today a very important matter, if you read newspapers sometimes. This history begins here, on these walls and on these columns, with such a motto that you may find everywhere in the Alhambra of Granada... (Patrimoine Mondial de l'Humanité selon l'UNESCO). Your opinion about the non artistic value of this picture is more relevant, I think. Not everybody is able to appreciate the middle-age Nasrid architectural sculpture and calligraphy. --Jebulon (talk) 20:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Question please, what do you mean with nothing special ?----Jebulon (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop, boring composition. Sorry. —kallerna™ 11:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the subject is very fitting (i.e. definitely educational) and generally the comp is good. But the lighting bugs me, there seems to be too much shadow if the subject is the detail on the column. Steven Walling 21:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I am sorry, but I do not find the composition particularly interesting. You should try nominating it for QI though. Tiptoety talk 22:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well the four opinions above are now very interesting for me. I understand that I have to work harder (maybe with a better camera too...). Many thanks for having detailed your reviews. Sometimes, you champions, you have to be more explicit, your comments are too shorts, and we, the people, we need to progress with your help ! No worries with the Whale ;). Tiptoety : IT IS a QI !!! . Friendly.----Jebulon (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Lighting is a bit off, but I like the composition and think it is indeed interesting. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The German and English translations contain errors. The German should be, "Es gibt keinen Sieger, außer Gott.", and in the English, the word "excerpt" should read "except". Jayen466 16:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry and Thank you. The effort was not entirely successful... Question I copy-pasted the ß. Cannot find it on my french keyboard...--Jebulon (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Merci, c'est bon maintenant. (The spellers have been corrected.) --Jayen466 23:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry and Thank you. The effort was not entirely successful... Question I copy-pasted the ß. Cannot find it on my french keyboard...--Jebulon (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)