Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 003.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 003.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2021 at 19:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada
  •  Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I think you fell into the trap I saw Diliff caught by sometimes. You take lots of shots all over, and then, because you have them, you want to use them. But the ceiling here isn't anything special, you get the idea of the pattern from less, and your top third has camera-shake issues. The excessive vertical perspective makes the round skylight look oddly distorted, like it is facing the viewer, rather than directly above them. Does your darkest exposure still have the lights blown? I'm not so bothered about the bulbs, but the column ideally shouldn't be blown.
However, I think File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg is superior to this view. The added height reduces distortions, and we get to see the galleries and the choir better. However, I'd trim it a tiny amount top & bottom to make a 4:3 crop, removing the rear of the pews at the bottom which emphasise them not being straight, and removing a little plain ceiling. -- Colin (talk) 17:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your detailed analysis, I think that with this type of church that is very small it is difficult to get a view without distortion. I did 5 exposures and also raised the ISO a bit to avoid too long exposure time. I had a hard time unifying the 5 exposures in a multi-photo panorama due to high CPU demand. I will take your recommendations into account, I sincerely appreciate your time to make these evaluations as well as reviews of my photos. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]