Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castelo fiocruz panoramico.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Castelo fiocruz panoramico.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2009 at 12:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by Econt (talk) -- Econt (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Econt (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Request Please correct the perspective, otherwise you may receive oppose votes. Diti the penguin — 13:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical quality insufficient for FP. There is strong chromatic aberration and blurriness, especially on the sides. --NEUROtiker ⇌ 13:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose ser snett ut /Ö 15:42, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm really sorry, beautiful but the perspective is too bad, you have to correct it. Jacopo Werther (talk) 10:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment A beautiful image, well stitched, low noise, good colours but ... :) I only mention this because it would be a pity to re-submitt it with the perspective fixed (including no leaning buildings) only to have people then complain :-) There is a stitching error, I will mark it with image-notes and there is a bit of distracting chromatic abberation (purple etc fringing), especially noticeably on the bollards at the entrance. If you need help with any of these things just ask :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 11:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I just think that's a good idea! Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the reviews. But how I correct the perspective?--Econt (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- A Google search will give you good answers. Diti the penguin — 20:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the reviews. But how I correct the perspective?--Econt (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I just think that's a good idea! Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Info new version --Econt (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results: