Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canon MP-E65mm.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Canon MP-E65mm.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2009 at 23:17:48
Info created, uploaded & nominated by -- Richard Bartz (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)- Info The MP-E 65mm Macro f/2.8 is a 5x loupe lens manufactured by Canon for use on the EOS photographic system.
Support -- Richard Bartz (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Question What's this white spot in the back? bamse (talk) 23:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- In the background ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, behind what I believe is the lens mount. Also if you look in the upper left corner of the picture there is some distracting pattern. Are those shadows or caused by the lighting? I checked that it is not dirt on my screen. In the picture of the Agfa Click, the background is uniform. bamse (talk) 11:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind, my fault. Changing the bit depth from 16 to 32 bit on my computer, everything in the back looks smooth now. I never noticed such problems before with other pictures. bamse (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, behind what I believe is the lens mount. Also if you look in the upper left corner of the picture there is some distracting pattern. Are those shadows or caused by the lighting? I checked that it is not dirt on my screen. In the picture of the Agfa Click, the background is uniform. bamse (talk) 11:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment Could you make the foreground totally white as well? --Muhammad 03:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- As well ? Is there a rule for bright backgrounds ? I prefer this style / aesthetic --Richard Bartz (talk) 06:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- The background seems flawlessly white. With the foreground white as well, it easier for designers who want to use the picture. I will support a white foreground version,
Neutral on this one --Muhammad 14:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC) - Support for "white" --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- The background seems flawlessly white. With the foreground white as well, it easier for designers who want to use the picture. I will support a white foreground version,
- As well ? Is there a rule for bright backgrounds ? I prefer this style / aesthetic --Richard Bartz (talk) 06:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Same thing as here (no wow). —kallerna™ 14:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)- Oppose should be nominated for "Quality Image"... not FP Dcubillas (talk) 03:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Dcubillas again. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
