Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 106.jpg

File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 106.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2024 at 11:02:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 106.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 106.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
•  Info Herd of Ankole-Watusi cattle of the Mundari tribe crossing the White Nile from the cattle camp to an area where they can graze during the day, Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry Poco, I often enjoy your photos and I'm sure this was a great sight in real life but there are a few issues here for me. Firstly, the composition is very busy - probably unavoidable given the subject but still the half-cut head on the right and the tuft of grass on the left are not ideal. The harsh daytime sunlight has washed out all the colours and there are burnt patches on the cattle in the background. Speaking of the cattle in the background, there is something going on there because despite the fact they are outside the field of focus, some of the cows have a sort of "fingerprint" pattern on them which must have come from the post-processing (presumably where there were folds in the skin). Lastly, despite the f/9 aperture very few of the cattle and their horns seem to be in focus, which is a shame. BigDom (talk) 12:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

• BigDom: I've improved the crop to get rid of some disturbing elements and also cloned out half a horn on the right side, better? And as you guessed, yes, the scene was overwhelming, seeing hunderts of those huge cows swimming with the eyes just over the water was an experience. Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

  Definitely better, thank you, but my opposition still stands; the colours are too faded and the depth of field too small for this to be featured IMO. BigDom (talk) 07:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose I'm sure this was absolutely amazing to see but, sorry Poco, just not enough of it is in focus for me to support. It would make a great cover on a glossy coffee table wildlife book but IMO not sufficient for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

• Okay, fair enough. I got this one wrong, I'm not sure the sharpness matters as much as I thought,  Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support I like this shot, it would be better to lean down, since cows on shore are not in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 06:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Why should the animals on the shore be in focus? Photography consists of sharpness and unsharpness, this is not an (old-style) painting. --Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support amazing to see here as well. Tomer T (talk) 11:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great composition, but I'm afraid the slow shutter speed is the problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charlesjsharp JukoFF (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. -- Ivar (talk) 09:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

• Perfect timing Poco a poco (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 00:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)