Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Busselton post office gnangarra 14.JPG

File:Busselton post office gnangarra 14.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2011 at 14:59:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Busselton post office gnangarra 14.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Busselton post office gnangarra 14.JPG

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Gnangarra 14:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Gnangarra 14:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am missing the wow here and color noise--Miguel Bugallo 17:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC). I don't like the dof or the composition--Miguel Bugallo 17:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Miguel Bugallo --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I think you did a good job making ordinary PO boxes semi-interesting. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 11:02, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support having rented and experienced many of Australia Posts' (previously PMG) lines of PO Boxes in a number of states (NSW, Tas, and WA) - I like the colour skew, and the focal issue - certainly after having so many black/grey lines in most sets - the uniqueness of the colour on the Busselton boxes alone make it an interesting picture SatuSuro (talk) 13:25, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Per One, please. --Ximonic (talk) 13:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Still some blurry parts on PO box 462, who is the only focused box of them all. The hinges on the same PO box are too bright and in bad quality. Also a "semi-interesting" picture, like IdLoveOne mentioned isn´t enough for me. Eather it is interesting all the way, or it isn´t interesting at all.--Snaevar (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 10:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)