Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhabrot-W1000000-B100000-L20000-2000.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Buddhabrot-W1000000-B100000-L20000-2000.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2010 at 19:04:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by UnreifeKirsche - uploaded by UnreifeKirsche - nominated by UnreifeKirsche -- UnreifeKirsche (talk) 19:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Support -- UnreifeKirsche (talk) 19:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)- Support - Cool!! Etincelles (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Patriot8790 (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Comment - Impressive, and very attractive at small sizes. However, when I view it at full size some parts (e.g. on the forehead, and near the centre of the chest) seem glaringly "over-exposed" to me. Have you considered using an off-white shade for the 1 million iteration component? -- Avenue (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I know, what you want to say. For me it's a matter of taste, I like this "over-exposed" look. I remember, that I knowingly decided white as the color, because an other color would go down in this picture. Unfortunaetly I can't easly change this look, even if I wanted. The problem is, that I combinded this image with GIMP, but I don't know anymore the gradient curves and exact colors I used and so on (a mistake, I know). If I do it again - I'm afraid - it'll become a different picture. I have found in the deeps of my harddisk an other gamma version, for the 1.000.000 iteration raw data, which is not this "over-exposed" - I'll upload it, in case you want to give it a try. --UnreifeKirsche (talk) 13:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the explanation, and the new upload. While the white areas aren't quite to my taste, the nominated image qualifies as an FP in my view. -- Avenue (talk) 09:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Spetacular, a worthy FP--Pianoplonkers (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support good --George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting!--kuvaly|t|c| 12:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Oppose IMO we have enough FPs like this. —kallerna™ 12:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 11:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. ZooFari 16:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
