Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Carmersbrug R01.jpg

File:Brugge Carmersbrug R01.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2009 at 21:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Carmersbrug R01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brugge Carmersbrug R01.jpg

•  Info created by MJJR - uploaded by MJJR - nominated by MJJR -- MJJR (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice! Lycaon (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad quality --kaʁstn 14:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nice picture of Brugge -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support for me this quality is good --Pudelek (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Avala (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a good picture, but IMO not good enough for FP. The light comes from an unfavorable direction so that the visible side of the bridge lies in shadows. Also the picture could be a little more "crispy". If you look at other FP, e.g. this or this, this one can't keep up. --NEUROtiker ^⇌ 20:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, I don't think the light comes from an "infavourable direction" at all. --Aqwis (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looking at the top of the bell tower, one can clearly see the sharpness issues. -- JovanCormac 05:53, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The subject of this photo is kinda unclear. I can't focus on anything. —kallerna™ 11:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just normal good quality image. --Karel (talk) 18:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)