Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburg-Havel pano (MK).jpg

File:Brandenburg-Havel pano (MK).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2014 at 13:42:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburg-Havel pano (MK).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburg-Havel pano (MK).jpg

•  Info Morning view over the Havel in Brandenburg with the St. Katharinenchurch in the background. c/u/n by me, mathias K 13:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- mathias K 13:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Must be seen full-sized to really appreciate. Just late enough that the colors aren't muted but not so much that the lights are. Even the water's interesting. Good quality, good shot. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 19:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not convincing at all. I am missing any clear compositional idea - no real eye catcher. The cutted reflections at the very top left are rather strange, the water surface is inhomogeneous, I guess due to stitching, the reflections do not come out well due to mixture of moving and non-moving parts of the water surface. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

• Your wrong here, the water sourface is due to wind and no-wind areas over the river in combination with the longer exposure. There is definitly no stitching error, if wished I can upload a single frame of the pano to proof that. --mathias K 14:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

I had not stitching errors in mind, but irregularities due to different time slots. If it is the correct representation of one moment it does not change my perception - the wind and no-wind areas have imho a negative effect on the overall image. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Support I beg you to use this panorama (as panorama, not "image") in related wikipedia articles --An678ko (talk) 16:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Tuxyso, third time in a row, no real eye-catcher here. The quality is really good but the composition is not outstanding IMHO Poco² 21:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- It is a bit dull. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:55, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

 Withdraw for this one... ;-) --mathias K 11:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)