Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blankenham, Kanon en kruithuisje.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Blankenham, Kanon en kruithuisje.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2014 at 08:31:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Baykedevries - uploaded by Baykedevries - nominated by Baykedevries -- Baykedevries (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Baykedevries (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, nothing featurable here for me. The car behind the cannon is a bit distracting and the crop is maybe a bit too tight. QI but not FP for me. --mathias mathias 11:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)- Oppose With mathias K, also resolution is relatively small. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much tightened composition. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose -- per mathias. Sanyambahga (talk) 06:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- I think complaining about not enough resolution is rather silly. All photographs should be down-sampled just too shut up the pixel peepers. This is a web based medium not a fine print business. Not many of us have 4k screens and we don't produce pictures to be sold as printed art by 3th parties. Also this picture might not be good enough but the subject is rather interesting. Does anyone even consider that fact, or are we all looking for noise and aberrations? Featuring something interesting is more important than absolute image quality. Just my 2 cent. --Uberprutser (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 13:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
