Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin-Koepenick Schloss1 05-2014.jpg

File:Berlin-Koepenick Schloss1 05-2014.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2014 at 20:11:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin-Koepenick Schloss1 05-2014.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin-Koepenick Schloss1 05-2014.jpg

•  Info All by A.Savin --A.Savin 20:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 20:11, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose The building has no depth.--Claus (talk) 21:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Very helpful review. --A.Savin 23:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral I think a frontal view will be better for this kinf of buildings. The light is also not suitable: angel + golden hour?. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support a little too much of NR on the trees IMO, however nice -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 05:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

  after another look, it's not so bad, well done -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 20:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnik^contribs 12:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jee 05:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)