Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG

File:Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2009 at 14:06:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG

•  Info created by Łukasz Golowanow (User:Airwolf) & Maciek Hypś - uploaded and nominated by Wolf (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment If you have the impression that this picture has already been nominated, you're almost right, this one has and now that I think of it, its failure was justified. The one here has a slightly lower resolution, but is definitely less blurry and I really like the diagonal composition (a rarity in aircraft photography) and the shadows which prevent a feeling of flatness. Wolf (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Significantly oversharpened. I can see the halos even at thumbnail size and they are rather distracting. Apart from that I love the image. Perhaps those from Konflikty.pl can be asked to upload the original so it can be more sympathetically processed ? - Peripitus (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

 InfoChromatic abberation has now been corrected. Additionally some compression artifacts have been removed or gently softened. Chalger (talk) 12:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

• •  Info There's a less processed version (just cropped in relation to the "original original") in the image history. Wolf (talk) 06:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
    •  Question How about now? Wolf (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment - edits have significantly improved the image but there are a lot of dust spots that need removal. I've marked the ones that I can see at even modest resolution as image annotations. - Peripitus (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

That's also been corrected. What do you think now? However I just must add those dust marks were hardly visible on two different properly calibrated monitors. Chalger (talk) 17:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

•  SupportChalger (talk) 17:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)