Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barack Obama speaks at Camp Lejeune 2-27-09 3.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Barack Obama speaks at Camp Lejeune 2-27-09 3.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2009 at 11:05:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Lance Cpl. Michael J. Ayotte, USMC - uploaded by BrokenSphere - nominated by JovanCormac 11:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Info An excellent shot of Obama giving a speech. Iconic, of very high quality, and more dynamic than the official portrait that has been nominated before. -- JovanCormac 11:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support As nominator. -- JovanCormac 11:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support agreed --NEUROtiker ⇌ 11:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support Agree, also the shallow depth of field here gives a beautiful result. →Diti the penguin — 13:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality problem: too small DOF, bad foreground (very distraction) --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think it is not a quality problem: the main subject is Barack Obama, not the microphone. The creative use of a small depth of field enabled the photographer to get rid of worse quality problems. →Diti the penguin — 18:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Mouth and a chin look it is washed away. It is low DOF problem. Part of head really not sharp. I understand that the photographer had no chance to change a composition, however microphones and clothes is very unhappy. It is a pity to me, I'm sorry, but this my fair opinion. I do not wish anybody to offend --George Chernilevsky (talk) 20:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think it is not a quality problem: the main subject is Barack Obama, not the microphone. The creative use of a small depth of field enabled the photographer to get rid of worse quality problems. →Diti the penguin — 18:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose distracting foreground --Avala (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. --Karel (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the microphone is annoying. /Daniel78 (talk) 08:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special, distracting angle and technical equipment in foreground. Does not contribute.No anonymous vote, please. →Diti the penguin — 21:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /JovanCormac]]) 19:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)