Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baobab Tree-001.jpg

File:Baobab Tree-001.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2013 at 09:37:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Baobab Tree-001.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baobab Tree-001.jpg

1796

1185

161

284

2778

1852

visible CA

1605

1093

463

512

2778

1852

unsharp (very soft) trunk (DOF)

•  Info created by Leo_za1 - uploaded by Leo_za1 - nominated by NJR_ZA -- NJR_ZA (talk) 09:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- NJR_ZA (talk) 09:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose a bit to soft for my taste, low DOF (and visible CA on the tree). Otherwise a very nice composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Alchemist, can you mark where you notice the CA? It will help to improve the images. --NJR_ZA (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Alchemist. --NJR_ZA (talk) 12:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Baobabs don't run ;-). An FP candidate should be crisp all over and void of CA. The blurry bushes to the left are also disturbing. Lastly, what happened to all the rest (15,862,928) of the pixels?  B.p. 14:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Biopics.--Jebulon (talk) 10:54, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 11:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)