Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:B-Tempelhof 10-2012 - Teltowkanal.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:B-Tempelhof 10-2012 - Teltowkanal.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2012 at 20:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info The autumn has gone, this HDRI shows an indian summer impression from Berlin-Tempelhof, with the Teltow Canal and the Ullstein Tower in the background. All by A.Savin -- 20:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Support -- A.Savin 20:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)- Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Oppose -- I have nothing against hdr oy any other way of improving the pictures and/or interpreting reality. But there is nothing extraordinat in this interpretation and I find the choice of colors a bit kitschy. Image quality is on the poor side as well. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)- Oppose Nothing special for me, colors are washed out, less details (s. notes), boring motive, IMHO no FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support I really like the colors. Michael Barera (talk) 02:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support— M♦Zaplotnik
my contributions17:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC) - Oppose A picture should be painted or photographed. This is a (for me) not useful mixture of both. Not reality, and not art. So I can't see any benefit in this pic. --Stepro (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- You're free to start a DR --A.Savin 21:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I see no reason for it. Between having an image on commons and vote for it as a featured picture is a wide range I think. It's marked as a QI, so at least one other user likes that pic, too. But having QI status doesn't mean for me it must be necessary a FP, too. --Stepro (talk) 23:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- You said that you can't see any benefit in this pic, I said then that you're free to nominate this pic for deletion. Is there something wrong? No. That's all. What you think on featurability of this pic doesn't interest me. --A.Savin 23:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- »What you think on featurability of this pic doesn't interest me.« - This is a nomination page for featured pictures. If you're not interested in the opinion of other users regarding the featurability of this pic maybe you're wrong here. --Stepro (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, your opinion doesn't bother me, because you're lacking QI/FP competency so far. --A.Savin 13:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- »What you think on featurability of this pic doesn't interest me.« - This is a nomination page for featured pictures. If you're not interested in the opinion of other users regarding the featurability of this pic maybe you're wrong here. --Stepro (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- You said that you can't see any benefit in this pic, I said then that you're free to nominate this pic for deletion. Is there something wrong? No. That's all. What you think on featurability of this pic doesn't interest me. --A.Savin 23:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I see no reason for it. Between having an image on commons and vote for it as a featured picture is a wide range I think. It's marked as a QI, so at least one other user likes that pic, too. But having QI status doesn't mean for me it must be necessary a FP, too. --Stepro (talk) 23:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- You're free to start a DR --A.Savin 21:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and hard to find such a corner in a place like Berlin. Regarding usability, this is FPC, not VIC Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 23:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
