Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthemis April 2010-1 (new).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Anthemis April 2010-1.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2010 at 15:44:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Second try. What can I say? I love this picture! Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose seems a little bit oversaturated, and I would prefer a better background. Ggia (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Info previous nomination is here [1]. Ggia (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but bad background. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just a side note (no complaints): the background is the best of the picture imo :). Also, saturation was not increased. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I actually like the colors of the background and they don't interfere or distract my eyes from the yellow and sharp subject. It could be oversaturated, I say that meaning I could understand how someone could think that, it exist as a possibility and I could be wrong, but to me it does seem natural. It's pretty. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, Joaquim Alves. This photo has been reviewed and not featured. 7 support, 6 oppose is clear result. It is incorrect second nomination IMO. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Comment if somebody whants to nominate again an image a simpler method should be found.. not re-uploading the image on commons and nominate as a FP. It is simply a waste of resources to have two indentical images uploaded in commons. Ggia (talk) 08:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Info -- I have already explained to Ggia, in a similar case, that the same image was used. @George Chernilevsky, nothing in the rules prevents re-nominations and pictures have been promoted this way. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Really nice colors. The color of the background is completely different from the subject, so it's not a problem for me. mgeo talk 16:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow for me and not so good photo. Sorry --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)