Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abigail Breslin 2011 Shankbone.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Abigail Breslin 2011 Shankbone.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2011 at 04:06:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created , uploaded by David Shankbone - nominated by Hoangquan hientrang -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 04:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 04:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I didn't even recognize her. Nice photo, but it's not a portrait. It reminds me too much of a red-carpet photo session, and although having a high resolution image of a celebrity on file is always wonderful and very helpful, they aren't exactly "special". The image is crystal clear, and Avenue did a fantastic job bringing the image back to life,
but the background seems muddy (I'm curious if anything was done to it),and the photo has the undesirable effects of flash photography, albeit soft flash photography, but it still has that bright-dark uber-contrast I dislike. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 07:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment After looking at Mr. Shankbone's other photography, he doesn't seem to tweak the backgrounds at all. Striked-out comment above. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 13:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support She resembles w:Nicholle Tom. The flash is noticeable (after it's pointed out) but IMO this is good. It looks well-executed, like it was taken in patience and not rushed and she clearly knows how to pose and has a good makeup person who knows what looks good for photography. And to be outright about shallowness she does look pretty here. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 05:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm also not too keen on the flash on that one, and like Kerαunoςcopia, I find it doesn't suits her very clear skin. - Benh (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)