Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbacy and lighthouse of Saint-Mathieu.jpg

File:Abbacy and lighthouse of Saint-Mathieu.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2010 at 14:22:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Abbacy and lighthouse of Saint-Mathieu.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbacy and lighthouse of Saint-Mathieu.jpg

•  Info created by Llorenzi - uploaded by Llorenzi - nominated by Llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llorenzi (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Interesting composition (the cross against the white lighthouse is a good idea, imho), enhances the contrast between the derelict abbacy and the more recent and still maintained lighthouse(s ?). Adequate quality and lighting (maybe on the soft side, but OK). Still, the perspective distortion bothers me, especially the leaning church on the right. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment I enhanced a bit the contrast --Llorenzi (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- May be a better and better image if more worked on it. Mulazimoglu (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment For example?--Llorenzi (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral interesting, composition perhaps too central. Might be better with the white building at far left cropped away. --Avenue (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment I eliminate the lighthouse on the left... Do you think is more interesting now?--Llorenzi (talk) 08:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Compositionally it is there for me. However the perspective distortion on the church is now more glaring. That shouldn't be hard to correct, though. --Avenue (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
      • Unfortunately I'm not so good in image processing... Maybe someone can do that for me?--Llorenzi (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
        • I tried something for you. If you dislike, or find it bad done, please feel free to revert to the previous version. No worries in this case !--Jebulon (talk) 00:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
          • Thanks a lot!--Llorenzi (talk) 08:00, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
            • I felt the crop was a bit tight, left and especially below, so I've loosened it a bit. Feel free to revert. --Avenue (talk) 12:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support either of the prespective corrected versions. --Avenue (talk) 12:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support With Avenue's work.--Jebulon (talk) 16:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting things are one over the other, over the other. Move to separate. Tanakashi (talk) Puppet. Yann (talk) 11:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition does not convince me + white balance should be edited a bit - I mean moved slighly to orange/red side. Also the sky is not very clear (grain). --Aktron (talk) 19:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)