Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A day of fishing aground.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:A day of fishing aground.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2014 at 16:29:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment Very nice view, interesting, with a good light and composition. I think it needs more denoising, the tire tracks are disturbing a little, and I see some color artefacts in the trees of the background, at right. Do you think you could do something ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Done @Jebulon: Nice review. What do you think? --The Photographer (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very well done. Yann (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 08:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support some minor technical issues (e.g. sharpness), but great composition and awesome mood. Clearly FP to me. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose A rotting abandoned boat attracts photographers like flies. But this one just isn't atmospheric enough imo in both subject and composition. The image has been a bit over-processed -- I don't mind bringing some sky back but the result here is very flat tone and grainy and an oddness with blue sky but evening-like shadow. The image below is I suspect a more faithful version. The boat leads the eye towards the rather dull group of trees on the right, whereas it should be drawn to a characterful boat, which this one isn't. Perhaps shot from another angle in some more atmospheric light (blue hour?) may make something of it? -- Colin (talk)
- Comment You could try a better develop. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 05:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Neutral The composition is not striking but the main problem I see is the lack of sharpness, I have troubles to figure out where is the focus of the image Poco2 08:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral Giving the daylight situation for me the noise level is relatively high. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support I preffer this version --The Photographer (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 10:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Info Another version developed with CaptureNX2 --The Photographer (talk) 21:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment The nice sky is all gone here. :( Yann (talk) 05:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please use sRGB for web images, not AdobeRGB: the result is the wrong colours for most and non-smooth gradients for others. There's really no advantage to using it for JPGs. -- Colin (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is Nikon Adobe RGB imported from CaptureNX in Adobe Photoshop. I invite you to read this. Nice review --The Photographer (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- User:The Photographer The difference between official and Nikon variants of the colourspaces seems to concern how the profile is defined, not how the colours are stored or ultimately what the 255/0/0 RGB value in your JPG maps onto on your monitor. JPGs only have 8-bits to express each colour and so are not a good choice of wide-colour-gamut profiles like AdobeRGB. Almost everyone viewing images on the web has an sRGB monitor and their OS and browser only really handle sRGB well. It is really only colour professionals (such as a print shop) who can handle AdobeRGB images. I keep meaning to write up a page on this issue. But briefly, your raw file has no colourspace so it is only when you save to JPG (or TIFF) that a colourspace needs chosen. For Commons JPGs we should only use sRGB. -- Colin (talk) 08:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is Nikon Adobe RGB imported from CaptureNX in Adobe Photoshop. I invite you to read this. Nice review --The Photographer (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Comment Thanks Wilfredo for the NEF file, I gave a try -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Also OK. Yann (talk) 10:57, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The removal of the tyre tracks shows. --Charles (talk) 17:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles
The chosen alternative is: File:A day of fishing aground.jpg
