Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4960 Northbound South of Willaha on Arizona's Kaibab Plateau.jpg

File:4960 Northbound South of Willaha on Arizona's Kaibab Plateau.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2014 at 13:07:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:4960 Northbound South of Willaha on Arizona's Kaibab Plateau.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:4960 Northbound South of Willaha on Arizona's Kaibab Plateau.jpg

•  Info created by Drew Jacksich - uploaded by Tillman - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 13:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 13:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose noise and blur --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak support -- Nice photo, but what's special about it? Compared to, forex,

MCR No. 25, 1925 2-6-2 ALCO

Now, there's a train photo! --Pete Tillman (talk) 00:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC) (belatd sig)

•  Comment I think everybody here is well capable of making a decision without requiring a comparison with a completely unrelated image, which I find a bit inappropriate regardless of whether the nominated image should be a FP or not. Furthermore, there I see a lot of steam (or is it smoke) in evening light - not exactly a great train photo to me. --DXR (talk) 21:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Same photographer, and tastes differ --Pete Tillman (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure, didn't want to say that it was poor at all, just found it a bit unusual to post another image in a nomination as the example for a FP-worthy train photo. Did you post the unsigned comment? (checked history in the meantime) --DXR (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Addition: However, as you were the uploader of the image, I must weaken my criticism a bit, obviously this makes the suggestion more logical, sorry. --DXR (talk) 23:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

No problem, sorry for no sig to further confuse things. I'm not a regular here, just an uploader of stuff ;-] I do like that tower of smoke! --Pete Tillman (talk) 00:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Yann (talk) 06:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support EveryPicture (talk) 17:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurred and pixelization in the sky Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, angle. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! Quality is OK IMO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Isn't it tilted? I'd apply a cw tilt and some perspective correction to ensure that the poles on the left remain straight Poco² 09:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 14:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC)