Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Panoramic view of Santa Rosa de la Eminencia Castle.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:360° Panoramic view of Santa Rosa de la Eminencia Castle.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2016 at 19:24:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360° Panoramic view of Santa Rosa de la Eminencia Castle
There are different types of panoramic 360 degrees, this photograph is not a spherical 360 and that is the reason why not work with the viewer. It's a planar 360 panorama and this kind of technique is generally used for the images that cannot be completed in one time, such as streets or fort architecture. The camera is translated at equidistant along the subject, until the whole subject is completed. Then the pieces are synthesized to be a panoramic photo, which is called planar panorama. See also Understanding Projecting Modes--The Photographer (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please, could you add a note?. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 18:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I´ve done so. --Milseburg (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Effectively all white, known as "blown-out highlights" or "clipped whites" is actually the Sun and "stitching error" is a 1600 canyon deformed because oxidation process. --The Photographer (talk) 19:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Question - How do you suggest we view this photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The JPG file format is based on a 24-bit color palette, however, these files tend to drop information when they are decompressed. For example you and your friends could use a MacBook Pro 15″ has a resolution of 2,880×1,800 or 220 pixels per inch, however, at this scale, most people are unable to notice panorama images on individual pixels at typical viewing distances. Thanks for your question --The Photographer (talk) 00:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have a Lenovo ThinkPad, not a Mac, and I still don't understand how I should view this photo. You're not saying a Mac is required to view this photo, are you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My personal recomendation is a Asus VE247H 24" Full HD Display, however, it's a suggestion not a requirement. This is a monitor of excellent quality vs price. The Asus 24 inch (technically 23.6") VE247H TFT LED-backlit LCD display is a pretty decent bargain, coming in at around $160 at Amazon (available this month with an additional $20 rebate, and often on sale from other retailers around the $150 mark). It's full HD, with a native resolution of 1920px by 1080px (60hz) and 16:9 aspect ratio and excellent to see panorama pictures. --The Photographer (talk) 01:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to buy a different screen. My screen has been perfectly adequate for viewing everything else. Shouldn't anyone with a decent screen be able to view a photo? I don't get it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ✓ Done --The Photographer (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Still numerous stitching errors, I added some annotations. The front part of the cannon is ceartainly not real (unless the cannon became transparent from the aging, allowing the background to be seen behind its edge). --Kreuzschnabel 13:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the notes, however, I preffer don't fix something that I think that are problems an infrastructure of nearly 500 years. The note "Whats this", it look like Parque El Agua (A turistic park) --The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The issues I pointed out are clearly stitching errors and won’t be found in reality. Since you refuse to fix or even accept them,  Oppose on my part. --Kreuzschnabel 18:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I can't fix a problem that I can't detect --The Photographer (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]