Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014.05.31.-03-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau-Wilde Malve.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2014.05.31.-03-See Pfingstberg Mannheim-Rheinau-Wilde Malve.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2014 at 16:53:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info All by me. Hockei -- Hockei (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Hockei (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I can support a crop more tight (top and right) (=a less centered position of the main flower and less empty green space). -- Christian Ferrer Talk 07:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Done I think this version looks better. --Hockei (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support your other nomination is better IMO, sorry I've just seen it. -- Christian Ferrer Talk 18:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I don't see any wow in a straightforward photo of a flower with no real composition. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 08:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per j_h, but technically good. --Yikrazuul (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- PS: What is the striking difference to this?
- Not sure what you mean. I prefer the other one. You can give a vote for that. Here are many pictures where I cannot find any wow (or they have other things) and they were chosen as FP. --Hockei (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- PS: What is the striking difference to this?
- Oppose colours look oversaturated to me. --mathias K 10:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed Saturation reduced --Hockei (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Question mathias K, would you please review the new version? Otherwise I'll come up with the idea that your statement is just a revenge of my rejection against your picture. Although I don't want to think so. --Hockei (talk) 14:53, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Hockei: Sorry to forget your nomination. No my vote wasn`t a revenge vote for anything. If you would had noticed me, like I do right now by "linking" your name, my answer would be earlier... So sorry again. But anyway, the saturation is a little better but still too much for my taste. Maybe it is because of the bit harsh light, I dont know. No bad picture but not featured to me. --mathias K 15:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results: