Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2012-03-16 22-02-35-startrails-4f-9min-1d.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2012-03-16 22-02-35-startrails-4f-9min-1d.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2012 at 14:11:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 14:11, 23 April 2012 (UTC)- Support -- Simply beautiful! -- Martino Ghisleni (talk) 14:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special or featurable, absolutly useless filename. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Absolutely useless? Why, I mean, there's data in it like the date, time, number of shots etc (It is confusing though, could definitely be improved). --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Where the Featured content ?--Telemaque MySon (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose For a star-trail picture to be FP, it needs a stronger composition. Either man-made or natural scenery + the star trails. Or a really amazing sky. This is city light pollution + short star trails. But unless we're looking at a fantastic star-trail sky it itself (which this is not - just Google), then this is just a pretty effect and hard to justify the educational value of it. Like sunsets. I also agree about the filename. The data belongs in the image description, not the filename. Colin (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
