Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20110419 Church of Redeemer Collage Ani Turkey.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:20110419 Church of Redeemer Collage Ani Turkey.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2011 at 00:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 00:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Ggia (talk) 00:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)- Info I made a collage of two images (different view) for higher EV when it is used in wikipedia. This image is from Ani. Ggia (talk) 00:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Is the angle of the building on my right correct? Inb4 "it's different than I'm used to and I'm not creative so {{oppose}}" -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 01:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment when you mean angle, what do you mean? both images are shot using 50mm lens. Ggia (talk) 08:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I mean that the image of the building on the right seems tilted slightly to the side more than the one on the left. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 06:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment ok. I will check it. thanks for the note. Ggia (talk) 07:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose bad collage. I don't like big black borders and it's disturbing because the hozions are on different heights, so imo it's more disturbing. Imo it would be better in two single images, in an article you can use e.g. Template:Double image or make two thumbs. I understand you idea with two images in a candidature of one subject, I think it's a good idea. Maybe a featured picture set nomination is better. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree. I like the borders, I like the clean division they make. Anyone with mspaint and an ounce of computer know-how could throw two pictures together but here it suggests to me that an effort was really made to ensure than everything is even and proportionate. I think it looks professional, it reminds me of a postcard. Also when looking at one picture the eye is definitely not confused or disturbed by a sudden seam in the sky. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 06:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Question can I nominate as FPC two images using the template that you mentioned? I didn't know about that. If it is ok to upload two different version and nominate them I could do it. Ggia (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)- SupportNice image -- Raghith (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Info new version uploaded with less black borders and fixing the little tilt of the horizon. Ggia (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Alternative version[edit]
Church of Redeemer, Ani, Turkey.
- Info the same two images using double image template. Is it possible to nominate at FPC images in this way, avoiding making a collage of them? Ggia (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Ggia (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support To me the pictures are all right. Also really interesting, much because of the good quality. --Ximonic (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support either one, both are good. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- weak Oppose – I thought about it a long time. Now I oppose again, sorry. Lighting is very good, quality is good, too. The idea is also superb with makes high EV. My problem is the composition: the framing is too tight to me. And I'm really sorry that I have to oppose here :( --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think with the current system it would be possible to nominate a set, IMO try to nominate both of them separately and maybe upload a slightly wider crop if available. ■ MMXX talk 20:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, set nominations are allowed. They're even discussed in detail in the rules directly above (at FPC). --99of9 (talk) 03:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support set Oh! I just see the rules! ■ MMXX talk 17:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
