Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20101009 Fylakio detention center for immigrants refugees Thrace Evros Greece.jpg

File:20101009 Fylakio detention center for immigrants refugees Thrace Evros Greece.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2010 at 19:29:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:20101009 Fylakio detention center for immigrants refugees Thrace Evros Greece.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20101009 Fylakio detention center for immigrants refugees Thrace Evros Greece.jpg

7007

9

1348

137

9011

1823

cutted off

9

100

82

283

9011

1823

cutted off roles

4127

1048

2478

647

9011

1823

shrubs obscure subject

•  Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Info This autumn there are several articles in mass media around Europe about the illegal immigration in Greece. i.e. this article Europe's gateway for illegal immigration or this documentary of the Norwegian TV about immigrants - refugees [1]. If you go to the 7:53 minutes of this video (it has English narration) you will see scenes from this detention center (the health conditions etc are bad in this detention center). On 21-Sep-2010 UNHCR reported that: "asylum situation in Greece is 'a humanitarian crisis'" [2]. Ggia (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ggia (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support for high ev and historic significance. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 20:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
  •  Info -- Please check Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#FPC bot and abnomral support votes on the use of abnormal template votes. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
    •  Info Actually, here an optional text has been specified using a correct template. I think the bot will accept that. --Slaunger (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
      •  Info -- Yes, I did it... Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:54, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
        • Ah, OK, I did not notice that, sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment adding weak/strong/anything else is just an expression of personal feelings. i am totally aware of the fact that these votes count as a single vote, still they can help express one's thoughts. perhaps there should be a poll on how to get this into policy/guideline - resulting in either deleting the template or encouraging people to use them. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 22:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a refreshing new kind of subject and valuable. The technical quality is really good, and the stitch is very well made. The light and colors are good as well considering the overcast conditions. I have the problem though that I do not easily see the really interesting part of this photo - the imprisoned refugees. A huge fraction of the area of the photo is taken up by cut off and not very relevant elements for the scenary, such as masts with power cables, road side crash barriers. For me an FP should tell its story for the viewer without having to read about the background and inspect a small fraction of the photo for the people. It is not that I only want to see the imprisoned refugees. They should be seen in context with fence, barbed-wire, some building structures, etc. But here there is simply much too much of the surrounding context IMO. Sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Discussion not relating to the nomination moved to here. --Slaunger (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support But there are at least 2 dust spots on the left hand side. Could you please remove them?--Mbz1 (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment thanks for the comment.. dust spots has been removed and the image is updated. Ggia (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 05:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- As Slaunger. Good quality and interesting but not special or beautiful enough for rechinh FP status. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree in principle with Slaunger. I'm not happy with the composition. Apart from the missing wow-factor there are imo some other problems. The crop on some parts (see annotations) is not good and the trucks are disturbing and obscure the building. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment - high educational value overcomes some of the issues with obscured view, particularly those that probably can't be helped. I think a careful recrop may improve it enough for me to support, particularly the distracting elements toward the edges. Jonathunder (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Olumsuz düşünen arkadaşlar sanırım haklılar. Bu resim dramatik ancak kompzisyon ve kalite olarak biraz hafif kalıyor. Belki yakından tutuklular çekilseymiş ilginç olurmuş. Mulazimoglu (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think there is too much contrast. --Aktron (talk) 11:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support per Peter Weis -- Onno Zweers (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose tooltips on photo are true. Tanakashi (talk) Puppet. Yann (talk) 11:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)