Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:12-06-05-innsbruck-by-ralfr-164.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:12-06-05-innsbruck-by-ralfr-164.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2012 at 19:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Ralf Roleček - uploaded by Ralf Roleček - nominated by Ralf Roleček 19:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Ralf Roleček 19:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- JDP90 (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Slick (talk) 11:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Question Looks tilted to me. Is that how it's supposed to be? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a Lens with 10mm and i was at the top of a parking house, looking bittle down, because this the picture must tilt a little bit. --Ralf Roleček 18:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I mean is rotation, rather than vertical distortion. It looks too CW to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- sorry for my bad english. look at vertical lines (windows), they are vertical. --Ralf Roleček 21:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, I guess so. Support King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:09, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- sorry for my bad english. look at vertical lines (windows), they are vertical. --Ralf Roleček 21:17, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- What I mean is rotation, rather than vertical distortion. It looks too CW to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it is a Lens with 10mm and i was at the top of a parking house, looking bittle down, because this the picture must tilt a little bit. --Ralf Roleček 18:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow. Tomer T (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)