Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Оса полист.jpg

File:Оса полист.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2024 at 01:43:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Оса полист.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Оса полист.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
•  Info created by Shapomacro - uploaded by Shapomacro - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 01:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- JukoFF (talk) 01:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Oversharpened, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 02:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

• Unsure whether this is FP anymore owing to Ermell's point about bad use of the clone stamp tool, it's quite noticeable. Cmao20 (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh hell, I don't know. This is an impressive closeup, but if a cloning tool was used on the compound eyes, I'm not really in a position to judge that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support --Thi (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment It would be great if not so overprocessed. And I would have rotated the image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oversaturated colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree, looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Clone stamping not good. The eyes look strange and per others.--Ermell (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell, the green parts of the eyes are not well done at full size, and also per my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell. Yann (talk) 15:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 06:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)