User talk:Zimmy
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:EBuddy Beta Main Screen.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:EBuddy Beta Main Screen.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I have corrected for a CC-2 license which is present on the source page. However this image is available on enWiki also with the previous license. If it is not acceptable, please delete, I do not have time to deal with a screen photo of a free software. --ZimmyHun 09:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- You need to provide some evidence to support your claim that the software is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license. As far as I can see, it's a closed-source application. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Not the software must be under CC, but the image, which is present on the source page. The software is not GPL, but free. --ZimmyHun 10:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Was the CC-by licensing of this screenshot approved by the copyright holder(s) of the software? If so, that's still okay per Commons:Screenshots, even if it's non-free software. (And here, we're concerned with freedom; monetary cost is irrelevant.) This should be demonstrated, and it should be made clear that only the screenshot (not the software) is CC-by licensed and that neither the screenshot nor the software is GFDL licensed, contrary to the current claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I checked it again. So, this picture was put on the web by eBuddy itself as you can see it on their website. Anyway, the program and the data has a free license as Commons:Screenshots states so it can be used. --Zimmy 19:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- As far as I can see the software itself is not Free software but rather closed-source proprietary freeware. If you believe otherwise, please provide the link to the source code and the software licence.
- I see that the Flickr account used to upload the screenshot indeed belongs to ebuddy.com per your link. However, they have published it there under the non-free Creative Commons Attribution No Derivative Works 2.0 licence, not the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 licence. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I am completely confused. Such CC license is not amongst the CC tags. Why? This image is not modified so we can use it rightfully. I see there is an answer in the Commons policy for it but I cannot understand. The owner accepted the free usage of the image under CC rights. What is the problem? Why a valid CC license is not enough for the Commons?
- Second, Commons:Screenshots states: screenshots can not be used on the Commons unless all components, programs and data shown in them are under some free license, so it does not require free software, but 'some free license'. Which there is.
- Third, that were my final words in it. Modify data or delete the image as you wish. I think this is pouring out our energy in vain. Millions of people use stolen programs, pictures, movies and we cannot use a screenshot of a free program with a valid license. Unbelievable! --Zimmy 21:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:StauntonPawn2.jpg is uncategorized since 30 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Osztolykán Ágnes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hidegkuti-nandor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 18:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Barabás Éva.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Elisfkc (talk) 19:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:V Naszályi Márta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tordai Bence.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tordai Bence.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:V Naszályi Márta.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:V Naszályi Márta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:V Naszályi Márta.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Kleb Attilával régebb óta kapcsolatban vagyok, így írtam neki a kép engedélyével kapcsolatban. Megérteném az álláspontját, ha nem adna engedélyt, mert eléggé pofátlanság, hogy engedély nélkül van fent a fotója ~5 éve. Legyél szíves, ne töltsél fel engedély nélkül semmilyen képet a Commonsra (se), kivéve ha az a koránál fogva már közkincs! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kocsis-Cake Olivio MP.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kocsis-Cake Olivio MP.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kocsis-Cake Olivio MP.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |