User talk:TommyG/Archive 2007 – 2010
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Vår hjelpefil for nybegynnere og vår OSS (ofte stilte spørsmål) vil være til god hjelp etter at du har registrert deg. Disse sidene forklarer hvordan du skal endre på utseendet (for eksempel språk), hvordan du skal laste opp filer, og vår grunnleggende lisensieringspolitikk. Du trenger ingen tekniske ferdigheter for å bidra her. Vær modig i dine bidrag, og anta det beste i andres intensjoner. Dette er en wiki – det er virkelig enkelt.
Mer informasjon er tilgjengelig på brukerportalen. Du kan be om hjelp på Tinget eller på IRC-kanalen #wikimedia-commons. Du kan også kontakte administratorer på deres diskusjonssider. Hvis du har spesifikke spørsmål om opphavsrett, spør på Commons:License questions. |
| |
(P.S. Ønsker du å gi tilbakemeldinger om denne beskjeden?) |
Litt seint å gi deg velkomstmalen nå, du har jo tross alt allerede gitt ganske mange bidrag her på Commons. Da jeg flyttet over det bildet som nå kalles Eidegrenda Bjugn.jpg tok jeg utgangspunkt i bildeunderteksten på no:Bjugn - dersom det skulle hatt et mer presist navn kan vi sikkert ordne det. Spør hvis det er noe tekniske Commonsgreier du lurer på, om jeg ikke kan svare så kan jeg finne noen som kan. Ser fram til flere bilder. mvh Finn Rindahl 22:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Det var vel jeg som la inn bildet på artikkelen om Bjugn i sin tid også, så bildeteksten er nok et godt utgangspunkt. Jerazol 07:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Gode greier, stusset litt på Eide/Eidegrenda. Flott bilde forrestet! Finn Rindahl 08:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Akkurat det ble endret av noen andre, jeg hadde opprinnelig skrevet bare Eide. Etter å ha dobbeltsjekket med gulesider.no/kart/, og søkt litt på google, så tror jeg nok det er Eide og ikke Eidegrenda. Det ser ikke ut til at jeg har mulighet til å flytte bilder, så om du har tilgang til å gjøre, så kan du kanskje omdøpe det til Eide Bjugn.jpg istedet. Jerazol 21:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ikke akkurat kjapt ekspedert, men nå skal - om systemet virker - en bot flytte bildet og erstatte forekomster i wikimediaprosjektene. Flott at du legger til koordinater. Finn Rindahl (talk) 17:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, om det hadde vært noen "krise", så kunne jeg vel ha søkt litt rundt, for å finne ut av det selv også da, men takk for at det ble gjort. Er vel ikke alle koordinatene som er 100% nøyaktige, da Google maps har ganske dårlig dekning i Norge, så vanskelig å finne tilbake til den nøyaktige plasseringen. Men, det blir vel sånn ca. i riktig område da, +/- 100-200meter eller så.Jerazol (talk) 18:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ikke akkurat kjapt ekspedert, men nå skal - om systemet virker - en bot flytte bildet og erstatte forekomster i wikimediaprosjektene. Flott at du legger til koordinater. Finn Rindahl (talk) 17:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Akkurat det ble endret av noen andre, jeg hadde opprinnelig skrevet bare Eide. Etter å ha dobbeltsjekket med gulesider.no/kart/, og søkt litt på google, så tror jeg nok det er Eide og ikke Eidegrenda. Det ser ikke ut til at jeg har mulighet til å flytte bilder, så om du har tilgang til å gjøre, så kan du kanskje omdøpe det til Eide Bjugn.jpg istedet. Jerazol 21:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Gode greier, stusset litt på Eide/Eidegrenda. Flott bilde forrestet! Finn Rindahl 08:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
re:Images from Bundesarchive to Coastal artillery
Totally cool. I was thinking about how this turned out to be an awful lot of German coastal artillery in Norway. However, shouldn't it rather be something like "German World War II coastal artillery in Norway"? Or something like that? Manxruler (talk) 20:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- That is of course true. I support you. I'll give you a hand with the category. Manxruler (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. It's really quite revolutionary for the German-themed articles, to go from almost zero photos to 100,000. And you're right, I wish there was an easier way for me to find, for example, the Norwegian photos in this new collection. They're starting to appear, but it's one slow process. Manxruler (talk) 21:10, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Come to think of it, Jerazol, wouldn't it make sense to create a German World War II coastal artillery sub category in the coastal artillery in Norway category? The German guns are the only ones not sub catted at the moment. Manxruler (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- And that cat would also be sub catted to Category:Atlantic Wall. Manxruler (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Alrighty. We'll look into it later. Come to think of it, I too have work tomorrow an probably should get to bed. Night then. Manxruler (talk) 21:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 16:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kjoekoy kommandobunker.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Armstrong guns from Bundesarchiv
Hi, the images you recently removed from Category:Armstrong guns are in fact pictures of armstrong cannons (except one). Have a look at http://www.nuav.net/coastgr4.html#Art.Gr.Trondheim-%C3%B8st, under MKB 1/ 506 Brettingen and MKB 2/ 506 Hysnes for more information. File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-116-0336-20, Nordeuropa, Küstenbatterie, Geschütz.jpg was my mistake. This is in fact one of the SKC/28 guns placed at Brettingen fort by the german occupation forces in 1942. The location and type of guns, was identified by the current manager of the museum at Hysnes fort (http://www.hysnesmuseum.no/), and confirmed by another unrelated person who was previously stationed at the fortress, while it was still active.. Jerazol (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please read the category description and the article on EN Wiki "Armstrong gun". This term does not refer to all guns made by Armstrongs... it referred to a very specific type of rifled breechloader made from 1859-1864 : the "RBL" type. This design was invented by GW Armstrong, hence the name. All other guns made by the company were generic standrardised designs not unique to the company, and should be filed under "Elswick Ordnance Company" (EOC) which was the correct name of the manufacturer and was what was stamped on the gun until 1927, when it became Vickers-Armstrong, which was really just Vickers. You will see the same naming problem with the "Vickers gun" which was only ever used to refer to the machine gun, not all guns made by Vickers. Regards. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)