User talk:Rechargeenergy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rechargeenergy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Beneficios de dormir para regular la función de la amígdala y reducir la ansiedad.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, we just read project scope in depth to avoid future confusions. The images you deleted were own work and data provided was extracted from investigations, clinical trials and others. We usually provide cites to data source in description, i do not remember if we missed in deleted images (due to deletion I cannot check file history). The images are already deleted and I cannot verify what was wrong with them. These images tried to explain some effects of sleep in our brain. Perhaps you consider these diagrams are so poor and they need a better design, and I can agree because these are not our best designs.
My question is: Can we try to make better diagrams about this concepts or is just out of project scope and they would be deleted again in future? Rechargeenergy (talk) 08:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]