User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2009/September

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Oath with Closed Caption

You closed the Commons:Deletion requests/File:20090120 Oath with Closed Caption.JPG. I have reuploaded this. I think there was a misunderstanding about its PD status. It was not a random TV broadcast, but rather a broadcast by the US Government. I am not sure if I had previously cropped this image. Can you tell if the prior image was of different dimensions? I don't check my talk page here often, but under the same name at wikipedia you could leave my talk page a message that I would see very promptly.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 22:57, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Can you tell me please the name of the new upload, so that I can compare the pictures? --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Das Schloss Nordkirchen

Guten Tag Mbdortmund!

Ich bin fertig, die Nomination zu unterstützen. Jedoch muss man die Schulter reinigen. Vogel- der Kennzeichnungen liegt auf der Schulter. Ganz werden es kritisieren, Ich so denke.

Ich wünsche den Erfolg in der Nomination!

mfg - George Chernilevsky (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi George,

Danke erstmal für Deinen freundlichen Kommentar. Ich hatte lange überlegt, den Taubendreck und die anderen Verschnutzungen wegzumachen, weil der Verfall der Statuen aus der Barockzeit real ist, einige sind inzwischen sehr stark verfallen und vom Vogelkot beschädigt. Ich habe aber vollstes Verständnis, wenn Du Dich unter diesen Umständen nicht für ein Pro entscheiden kannst. Die Kandidatur wird eh scheitern, weil es Skulpturen in der FP-Abteilung immer sehr schwer haben. Ich wollte einfach nur ein Feedback.

Weiter auf gute Zusammenarbeit. --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


Ich wünsche Ihnen den Sieg und nicht nur ein Feedback.
mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:54, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Conflict ?

Possible, it is personal conflict. Please, visit QI nominations and look Kallerna's voting in Consensual Review. Kallerna's voting is very similar to personal hostility. It is inadmissible in Commons and very incorrect for an administrator. Same was earlier two times. At that time Kallerna has received the polite remark from other users.

Possibly, the reason that I have rejected a few Kallerna's nominations. However I always support its good works. I am surprised by such relation, however I concern Kallerna friendly.

mfg --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not shure, if it is a personal conflict, I hope, it is not. But I will try to convince him that his voting is not OK in respect of the QI-principles.

mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok --George Chernilevsky (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Discussed misunderstanding now finished. The good friendship is good for Commons Wikimedia. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 17:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
That's good! --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Photographers Blackbelt


THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures.
--ComputerHotline (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the friendly feedback! --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much George! --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Mbdortmund/Archive/2009!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 19:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

done [x] --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wamel-090906-10150-Stephen-Lawson-Wegmarken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments excellent --George Chernilevsky 07:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soest-090906-10157-Lawson-Wegmarken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good.--Mbz1 17:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago-Maggiore 1327.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

archivieren --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nordkirchen-090806-9474-Akt-Venusinsel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nordkirchen-090806-9474-Akt-Venusinsel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

FP

Der Sieg! Featured pictures
Ausgezeichnet!
Ihre Variante ist mehr dokumentarisch und mehr dramatischer.
Es ist der ausgezeichnete Spürsinn des Malers.
Sie sind Meister.
Ich beglückwünsche Sie!

--George Chernilevsky (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Na, nicht übertreiben, ich würde wirklich gern besser fotografieren, aber was mir fehlt, sind technische Mittel und technisches Wissen. Aber die Auszeichnung freut mich wirklich. Danke für Lob und Unterstützung.

mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Nordkirchen-090806-9369-Nebengebaeude.jpg

Guten Tag, Mbdortmund!

Die Fotografie File:Nordkirchen-090806-9369-Nebengebaeude.jpg fordert die Korrektion.

  • Man muss den Fleck auf dem Himmel nach dem Zentrum entfernen.
  • Die leere Plastikflasche beschädigt das Äußere (unten rechts).

MfG -- George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
done [x] --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9338-Orangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice, good composition, better crop than the one below. --Relic38 04:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-Schloss-0122.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 08:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9369-Nebengebaeude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition --George Chernilevsky 13:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9372-Nebengebaeude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9377-Nebengebaeude-Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very accurate in trifles --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9520-Venusinsel-Frau-mit-Trauben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 04:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9507-Wasserterasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good, QI --George Chernilevsky 06:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9508-Venusinsel-Nordufer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good in detail --George Chernilevsky 06:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9344-Orangerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luedinghausen 0038-Felizitaskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luedinghausen 0045-Felizitaskirche-Portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9513-Knabengruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very high quality --George Chernilevsky 07:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-090806-9514-Knabengruppe-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very high quality --George Chernilevsky 07:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luedinghausen 0041-Felizitaskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI --Cayambe 07:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)