User talk:J.Grandgagnage/Archive1
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 11:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:BannerOccult.png is uncategorized since 4 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Native north americans.png is uncategorized since 15 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Guy_Didelez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- Deadstar (msg) 10:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you have permission from embee.be to upload the photo here with a cc-by-3.0 license, please send this email on to us. You can find information on COM:OTRS (or in Dutch Commons:OTRS/nl). -- Deadstar (msg) 10:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Jules Grandgagnage.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--MoiraMoira (talk) 08:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Over the Rainbow-Beachcomber-tenorsax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jafeluv (talk) 12:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Filmnoirportallong.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Filmnoirportallong.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Filmnoirportallong.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Polarlys (talk) 22:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Teenspirit riff.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Josve05a (talk) 21:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jack Sels by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jack Sels by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jack Sels by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Josve05a (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Views in Sydney and New South Wales 1930-40 by Charles F. Walton.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Views in Sydney and New South Wales 1930-40 by Charles F. Walton.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:BixBeiderbecke-Copenhagen.ogg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BixBeiderbecke-Copenhagen.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:BixBeiderbecke-Copenhagen.ogg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BixBeiderbecke-Copenhagen.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Tomatito.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Jack Sels by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Beachcomber, could you please explain this?
[edit]Jack Sels painting Jack Sels by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg
- Posted by user:Jules Grandgagnage on 3 February 2013
- Request for Deletion by user:Moonriddengirl on 16 February 2013:
- [1]
- As a derivative work without proper permission
- Deleted by user:INeverCry on 22 February 2013
- Request for Deletion by user:Moonriddengirl on 16 February 2013:
Exact same Jack Sels painting Jack Sels by Jules Grandgagnage.jpg
- Posted by Beachcomber on 7 September 2014
- Request for Deletion by user:Whaledad on 30 March 2015:
- [2]
- As a derivative work without proper permission
- Deleted by user:Jameslwoodward on 23 April 2015
- Request for Deletion by user:Whaledad on 30 March 2015:
Whaledad (talk) 02:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
It seems the likelihood of someone claiming a copyright violation in this case would be relatively small or practically nonexistent. I would gladly give credit to whoever made this photo, but it is untraceable. Much ado about nothing. Beachcomber (talk) 07:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- When something has been deleted through our normal processes, it is a serious violation of our rules to upload it a second time. If you think that the deletion was incorrect, you may post a note on the deleting Admin's talk page and, failing that, file an undeletion request.
- In this case the issue is that the painting is a derivative work of an album cover, see http://www.philipcatherine.com/pages/english/cd/j_sels.html and, therefore, cannot be kept on Commons without a license from the copyright holder of the cover and its photograph. The reasoning in your last sentence is prohibited by our Precautionary Principle. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Beachcomber, I know that that is what you believe, but it was explained to you several times that Wikimedia doesn't deal in likelihoods when it pertains to copyright violations. But that wasn't my question. My question is: Why do you repost a file under your Beachcomber account, that you initially posted under you Jules Grandgagnage account and was removed for copyright violation? Whaledad (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Because I like my painting so much? I understand it's your policy to be extremely careful, but in this case this seems overdone. I already explained that the photographer is unknown. Well, it's your loss, I can sell the painting now that it's no more under commons license. I'll buy some Jack Sels records on ebay. Beachcomber (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Beachcomber, your understanding of copyright law seems below par. In your last statement you suggest you couldn't sell the painting while a picture of it was published on Commons. That is of course utter nonsense. You can't (legally) sell the painting because it is a derivative work of something that you don't own the copyrights of and don't have the proper permissions for. Having said that: as an individual you will likely get away with it without any consequences and you may be willing to take the risk. As a large, global, and very visible organization Wikimedia cannot and should not take those kind of chances. I've also marked up several pieces of music below that you have uploaded, where - as far as I can see - you didn't secure the requisite permission from the composers or their heirs. Whaledad (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Those music uploads, I expected that to happen sooner or later. Some are traditionals though, and some are just a few bars and not the complete melody. I cannot imagine those are copyright violations? Beachcomber (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- "Those music uploads, I expected that to happen sooner or later." - This is very worrisome! Do you mean to say that you had "reasonable doubt" about the copyright status of those files and uploaded them anyway? Whaledad (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Something like that. Of course, it's not my cup of tea as I do not know much about such boring stuff. To each his own. Beachcomber (talk) 17:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- "Those music uploads, I expected that to happen sooner or later." - This is very worrisome! Do you mean to say that you had "reasonable doubt" about the copyright status of those files and uploaded them anyway? Whaledad (talk) 17:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Those music uploads, I expected that to happen sooner or later. Some are traditionals though, and some are just a few bars and not the complete melody. I cannot imagine those are copyright violations? Beachcomber (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Beachcomber, your understanding of copyright law seems below par. In your last statement you suggest you couldn't sell the painting while a picture of it was published on Commons. That is of course utter nonsense. You can't (legally) sell the painting because it is a derivative work of something that you don't own the copyrights of and don't have the proper permissions for. Having said that: as an individual you will likely get away with it without any consequences and you may be willing to take the risk. As a large, global, and very visible organization Wikimedia cannot and should not take those kind of chances. I've also marked up several pieces of music below that you have uploaded, where - as far as I can see - you didn't secure the requisite permission from the composers or their heirs. Whaledad (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Because I like my painting so much? I understand it's your policy to be extremely careful, but in this case this seems overdone. I already explained that the photographer is unknown. Well, it's your loss, I can sell the painting now that it's no more under commons license. I'll buy some Jack Sels records on ebay. Beachcomber (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Beachcomber, I know that that is what you believe, but it was explained to you several times that Wikimedia doesn't deal in likelihoods when it pertains to copyright violations. But that wasn't my question. My question is: Why do you repost a file under your Beachcomber account, that you initially posted under you Jules Grandgagnage account and was removed for copyright violation? Whaledad (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Filmnoirportallong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Yesterday-tenorsax-beachcomber.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Takemehomecountry roads.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Tenderly-by Beachcomber.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:You'd be so nice to come home to by Beachcomber-tenor sax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:There Will Never Be Another You by Beachcomber-tenor sax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Stardust-by Beachcomber-tenor sax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Astimegoesby-by Beachcomber-altosax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:I'll See You In My Dreams-Beachcomber-tenorsax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Stormyweather-byBeachcomber-tenorsax.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Blue Moon on alto saxophone.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Circle of Smiles chromatic harmonica.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Buachaill on Eirne D tin whistle.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Buachaill on Eirne Bb tin whistle.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:My Heart Will Go On theme- fragment on tin whistle.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:I Can't Get No Satisfaction intro.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Paranoid - intro.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Hellaintabadplacetobe intro.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Girlfromipanema26bars.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Stlouisblues-9bars.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Timeaftertime-16bars.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Body&soul-first8bars.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Voodoo Child riff.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 14:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Street watercolors by Alvaro A Novo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Almost eureka by Alvaro A Novo.jpg
- File:Half by Alvaro A Novo.jpg
- File:Street coffee by Alvaro A Novo.jpg
- File:Sound the alarm by Alvaro A Novo.jpg
- File:Hates paparazzi by Alvaro A Novo.jpg
- File:Untitled by Jonathan Petit.jpg
- File:Big Brother by Martin Hricko.jpg
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Joe Henderson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Whaledad (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Mark Macken - Opschik 1952 crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |