User talk:Joao Xavier
Image deletion warning | Image:Vietnam-coa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Thuresson 17:57, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Caro João, faltou apontar a licença e a imagem da qual é derivado o seguinte mapa: Natal in Brazil.png. Obrigado. --Patrick-br msg 17:51, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Olá João, eis as respostas:
- Atualmente eu moro em Caruaru.
- Para acrescentar a licença correta à sua imagem, coloque a seguinte marca: {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}.
- Veja o exemplo: na imagem RN-microrregião-Borborema-Potiguar.png eu indiquei que utilizei como base a imagem Rn-microrregiões.png. Se você também tomou por base um mapa produzido por outra pessoa, deve indicar essa informação em Image:Natal in Brazil.png.
- Fique à vontade para mais esclarecimentos :-).
--Patrick-br msg 11:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Isabelperon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Thuresson 16:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Missing information
[edit]You uploaded the images listed below and tagged them with GFDL. That license requires attribution but you did not provide that information. Please add the missing information as quickly as possible. Images with an unknown source may be deleted 7 days from now. Thuresson 12:05, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- Image:Br SP.png
- Image:Image-Br RN.png
- Image:Herb Gdyni1.PNG
- Image:Flaga Gdyni1.PNG
- Image:Kazakh coa.png
- Image:Greece coa.png
- Image:Guyana coa.png
- Image:Austria coa.png
- Image:Aruba coa large.jpg
If you'll continue to forge licenses without providing source, you'll be blocked. --EugeneZelenko 05:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- Aren't the informations provided by en:wiki enough to prove that coats of arms like the Austrian coat of arms, the Gdynia flag and Gdynia coat of arms, and so on, enough to prove that they are "free to use"? I've copied all of the images that I've sent here from the en:Wikipedia (see, for example, en:Austria, and you'll see that coat of arms there. THEY ARE NOT FORGED BY ME. If, by a mistake, I've informed a wrong license of image (for example, GDFL instead of "US-Government public image" (if this specification exists, I do not know) and someone else knows the correct one, that person should correct the information, and not erase the image (unless that person wants to prejudice other wikis that point to that image in commons). Sorry for my bad English, because my native language is Portuguese. Would you mind answering me? Thank you. With regards, Joao Xavier 20:36, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- en:Image:Austria coa.png is not providing any information about copyright status. It could be PD, but could be fair use too. It also luck information about author/source. This is why you can't move such images from English Wikipedia to Commons.
- Just a hint: you could upload COAs (and please convert them to PNG) images from http://vector-images.com (we had permission from them) and mark such images with {{Vector-Images.com}}.
- EugeneZelenko 20:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Re: Hi, Eugene, how are you? (about:Manuel Quintana)
[edit]Hi, Eugene, how are you? Hope you're doing fine.
- Thank you. I'm fine :-). --EugeneZelenko 15:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
I was writing a translation to Portuguese about Manuel Quintana when I've found, in his image (at image:Manuelquintana.jpg) an information of "unknown copyright status". When I saw the copyright tags available, I'd thought that the best ones could be {{PD-AR-Photo}}, because it has more than 25 years since it was taken (the man has died in 1906!), or even a tag that said "it's copyright has expired", because, as he had died in 1906 and we are in 2006, there's been 100 years, time enough to expire a copyright anywhere. I did not modify the tag because I don't know which one is more apropriate in this case.
- I think {{PD-AR-Photo}} can't be applied as for now, because it contains next requirement author and source must be acknowledged. Image description lucks this information. You could try to add missing information and therefore use this tag. Source should be some printed publication.
- There was proposal to assume PD for images older than 100 years but (AFAIK) it's not Commons policy yet. --EugeneZelenko 15:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
How's the winter in Belarus this year? With regards,Joao Xavier 20:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- As my mother told more or less normal. But during one week temperature went below 20 °C. --EugeneZelenko 15:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Santamarta.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Santamarta.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. [[Wikipedia:User:Zsinj|Zsinj - [[Wikipedia:User talk:Zsinj|talk]]]] 03:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Hugh_Laurie_Portrait.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Hugh_Laurie_Portrait.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dantadd✉ 22:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Levy Mwanawasa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Rtc 07:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:GustavHusak.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:GustavHusak.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 14:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Negri176.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
---Nard 15:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Ray Parker Jr.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Ray Parker Jr.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 03:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Max_Ernst_1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
82.228.89.180 19:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Goteborg flag.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Lokal_Profil 22:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nlchtownes.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mark (talk) 03:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Escudocartagena1.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Escudocartagena1.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Escudocartagena1.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--83.154.10.110 07:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
File tagging Image:GeneKrupa.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:GeneKrupa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:GeneKrupa.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Filip em (talk) 08:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Peter Agre cropped.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lonardi1.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lonardi1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Lonardi1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Cambalachero (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Lo que están pidiéndote es que indiques la publicación (diario, libro, etc.) de donde sacaste la foto. Las fotos no publicadas no pueden tener la plantilla {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Saludos, Alpertron (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stadt salzburg flag horizon.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stadt salzburg flag horizon.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 21:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Sockpuppet
[edit]Obrigado, Xavier. Você ajudou muito :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- PS No entanto olha aqui -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 08:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 15:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Mondriaan.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mondriaan.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
originally sourced to image that has since been deleted as copyvio, see file history BevinKacon (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Mercosul-Bandeira.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mercosul-Bandeira.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Mercosul-Bandeira.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Conic Sections IDO language.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Conic Sections IDO language.svg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Conic Sections IDO language.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Pedro Verona Rodrigues Pires.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|