User talk:H.p.frei

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, H.p.frei!

-- 05:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, H.p.frei!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien

[edit]

Hallo H.p.frei. Bitte keine Oberkategorien in die Bilder einsetzen. Das Kategoriensystem ist hierarchisch aufgebaut, so ist z.B. die Gemeindekategorie Authumes in die Kategorie Cities and villages in Saone-et-Loire eingehängt, diese in die Kategorie Geography of Saône-et-Loire, diese wiederum in die Kategorie Saône-et-Loire usw. Die Hauptkategorien gibt es auf commons nur in Englisch, Kirchen werden daher unter Churches in ... eingeordnet. Im Bereich Frankreich gibt es für alle Départements Kirchen-Kategorien (Beispiel: Category:Churches in Saône-et-Loire. gruss Rauenstein (talk) 00:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Chêne Sec.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Note that Google maps are NOT free! -- Ies (talk) 17:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Römerstrasse Va Louhans-Pierre-de-Bresse.xcf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 12:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 12:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo H.p.frei, erstmal vielen Dank für die schönen Wappenbilder. Bei diesem hier darf der Turm laut Blasonierung allerdings nur drei Zinnen haben. Kannst du das noch reparieren? Außerdem sieht es so aus, als hättest du den Turm aus File:Blason ville fr Carros 06.svg "geklaut". Auch wenn dieses Bild frei lizensiert ist, musst du trotzdem in deiner Version den Benutzer Chatsam zitieren, ansonsten gilt seine Lizenz nämlich nicht für dich. De728631 (talk) 21:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@De728631ː Ich habe den Turm angepasst und er ist von mir. Bitte teile mir mir, ob Du damit einverstanden bist. Danke - --H.p.frei (talk) 17:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das sieht gut aus. Vielen Dank. De728631 (talk) 18:56, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo De728631 - Ich habe auf der Seite Gemeindewappen Saône-et-Loire die Wappen ergänzt, die das Arrondissement Louhans betreffen, da ich dort die Gemeinden bearbeite. Ich habe die Wappen auch auf der Seite WP-fr Gemeindewappen S&L ergänzt und auch festgestellt, dass Du dort den Link zu Archives71...Vincelles eingefügt hast. Ich habe die zwei anderen Gemeinden mit dem Buchstaben "V" ebenfalls verlinkt und es bleibt die Frage, ob ALLE Gemeinden verlinkt werden sollen. In der WP-de habe ich die Details zur Heraldik im Gemeindeartikel direkt integriert (-> Bellevesvre 3.4). Die andere Möglichkeit wäre, direkt bei der Blasonierung einen Link "Quelleː arch.../arko" einzufügen, was die Weblinks doch erheblich reduzieren würde. Danke für Deine Meinung und Deinen Vorschlag, wer was macht ː-D -- --H.p.frei (talk) 13:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vincelles hatte ich nur verlinkt, weil die Blasonierung vorher offenbar falsch war (die Rauten müssen golden sein). Was die sonstigen Einzelnachweise angeht, bin ich der Ansicht, dass man es damit nicht übertreiben sollte. Da wo es Unstimmigkeiten gibt, sollte man Links auf die direkte Quelle setzen. Ansonsten wäre es wohl besser, die Nachweise in den Artikeln über die jeweilige Gemeinde auf FR-Wiki zu führen, wenn dort das Wappen explizit erwähnt wird. Da ich auf FR-Wiki wegen mangelnder Sprachkenntnisse aber eigentlich so gut wie nie aktiv bin, überlasse ich Dir gerne das weitere Vorgehen. De728631 (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello H.p.frei, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Büste von Ferdinand Bertier.JPG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 13:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Wappen Cuiseaux.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wappen Cuiseaux.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright status: File:Wappen Cuiseaux.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wappen Cuiseaux.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Du hast für Authumes Gemeindeschema Plan.svg OpenStreetMap als Grundlage genommen und darfst daher die Datei nicht unter CC0 setzen! In Authumes Gemeindeschema.png hattest du es vor Jahren noch richtig gemacht. Du hattest damals einfach die Vorlage {{OpenStreetMap}} genutzt statt jetzt {{Information}}. Alternativ könntest Du jetzt die bestehende Infobox behalten, aber {{ODbL OpenStreetMap}} als Lizenzvorlage nutzen (wird auch intern in {{OpenStreetMap}} verwendet). Bitte ändere es für die frisch hochgeladene Datei. Speravir23:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Einerseits Danke für Deine Änderungen, andererseits war mir selbst etwas nicht klar: Die von dir eingetragenen Werte für Urheber (author) und Erlaubnis (permission) sind im mehrsprachigen Projekt Commons problematisch, weil Deutsch nicht die Sprache ist, von der wir erwarten dürfen, dass die große Mehrheit sie beherrscht. Während permission einfach hätte frei bleiben könne, weil ja ein eigener Lizenzabschnitt vorhanden ist, ist das mit dem Author nicht möglich. In {{OpenStreetMap}} werden sie in mehrere Sprachen übersetzt. Ich werde jetzt gleich nach meiner Antwort wenigstens das Englische noch aus der Vorlage übertragen, aber für die Zukunft muss man sich wohl merken, für die entsprechenden Fälle nur noch {{OpenStreetMap}} zu nutzen. Speravir00:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So, das ist jetzt etwas peinlich für mich: In {{ODbL OpenStreetMap}} steht in dem vielen fetten Text unter anderem: „This template should be applied to all images derived from OpenStreetMap data downloaded on or after 12 September 2012; it should always appear along with some other license template that indicates the license applicable to the map itself.“ Das bedeutet, es wird neben der Odbl-Lizenz noch eine weitere gefordert. Es wird dann auf New licence for the “standard style” tiles from openstreetmap.org im OpenStreetMap Blog verlinkt, wo man diese Passage lesen kann: „The relevant legal text can be found in 4.3 of the ODbL https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/index.html and essentially only requires attribution in a suitable form.“ Die Kursivsetzung ist von mir. Jede Lizenz, die eine Namensnennung erfordert, ist also möglich, aber die von dir ursprünglich gewählte CC0 ist daher nicht erlaubt. Mein Vorschlag: Am nächsten, weil noch am Wenigsten reglementierend, kommt dem die {{Attribution only license}}, die solltest Du zusätzlich (!) zu {{ODbL OpenStreetMap}} einfügen. Speravir00:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Speravir Vorerst vielen Dank für die Unterstützung, es ist bei weitem nicht meine Absicht, irgendetwas falsch zu machen. Mein Ziel ist eigentlich nur, für das Arrondissement Louhans möglichst informative und gute Seiten zusammenzubasteln. Offensichtlich ist aber das Thema Lizenzierung doch nicht so einfach (für mich war es das noch nie). Ich habe nun noch die letzte Ergänzung eingefügt und werde die übrigen Dateien, die ich hochgeladen habe ebenfalls so korrigieren, wenn ich von Dir keine Neuigkeiten mehr höre ː-) Liebe Grüsse und ein schönes Wochenendee - ˞˞˞˞˞˞˞˞Hanspi