User talk:DerFussi/Archiv/2018/March
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
March |
Transparency corrected
@DerFussi: , thanks for your edit about my PNG file ambigram Free nominated as a QI [1]. Now I've uploaded a new version of the drawing with adjusted transparency. As far as I know, this problem came from a bug from the old version of Photoshop I have. Now corrected. It would be nice if you had a look again to check the improvement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- @DerFussi: , if you don't see the difference, it's certainly due to your cache. Then, to display the last version click here [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Ambigram_Free.png?action=purge]. The syntax of the address will purge the cache from your computer and display the right file -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- I am aware of the cache. I have clicked the newest version in the wiki history two download it. Did somebody recheck it? I am now on vacation in Thailand and no Photoshop or any image software with me. And in the browser you can not see the transparency. -- DerFussi 01:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- @DerFussi: If you don't support it as you promised after correction, at least would it be fair to strike your opposition. Because the correction was made, and there's no problem anymore. I use Photoshop too, and that's true there was an issue with the first version, I admit, noticed it too, and am grateful that you pointed this out. But the new file I've yet uploaded is different, with the mistake fixed. It's a shame you don't have a computer now, but in the situation you're still opposing with not a good reason. I live in Laos, enjoy Thailand -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have striked it out but not turned into pro. I have intentionally downloaded the second version but nobody was so kind to recheck it. I have just waited for an answer of the others. The voting is still running. So, no problem. I am online but unfortunately no software to check it. -- DerFussi 16:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- @DerFussi: If you don't support it as you promised after correction, at least would it be fair to strike your opposition. Because the correction was made, and there's no problem anymore. I use Photoshop too, and that's true there was an issue with the first version, I admit, noticed it too, and am grateful that you pointed this out. But the new file I've yet uploaded is different, with the mistake fixed. It's a shame you don't have a computer now, but in the situation you're still opposing with not a good reason. I live in Laos, enjoy Thailand -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- I am aware of the cache. I have clicked the newest version in the wiki history two download it. Did somebody recheck it? I am now on vacation in Thailand and no Photoshop or any image software with me. And in the browser you can not see the transparency. -- DerFussi 01:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shanghai - Longhua Tempel - 0024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krabi - Krabbenskulptur - 0001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Renaming Kit socks pol18H.png
Yes, I decided to change my name, moreover there was an error in the description.