User talk:FlocciNivis

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:DavidJRasp)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, FlocciNivis!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland - Ergebnisse veröffentlicht

[edit]

Hallo FlocciNivis,

die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland sind nun veröffentlicht. Vorjury und Jury haben aus 12.000 Fotos im Wettbewerb die besten 50 Einreichungen in den Kategorien Landschaft und Detail sowie drei Fotos mit Sonderpreisen ausgezeichnet. Wenn deine Fotos unter den ersten Plätzen sind und du einen Gutscheinpreis erhältst, hast du bereits eine Nachricht erhalten.

Hier findest du alle ausgezeichneten Fotos.

Wir haben dir bereits den Link zu unserer Umfrage geschickt. Wenn du sie noch nicht ausgefüllt hast, würden wir uns freuen, wenn du noch bis zum Sonntag den 18. August teilnimmst.

Falls du nicht bis 2025 auf den nächsten Fotowettbewerb warten willst, kannst du im September bei Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland oder einem anderen der teilnehmenden Länder deine Fotos zum Thema Kulturerbe hochladen.

Noch einmal vielen Dank im Namen des Organisationsteams und der Jury GPSLeo (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heritage Guard Network: Questionnaire for photographers and volunteers

[edit]

📸If you are a professional or amateur photographer, volunteer, or have pictured and uploaded your images for the international Wikimedia photo contests, we need your help!

✍️Within the project Heritage Guard Network, we are collecting responses from people who have experience photographing, especially in nature-protected areas or cultural monuments and faced some risks. This will help to sum up the final papers and answer the main questions that we asked for this seed project.

📜SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE IN THE FORM BY 5TH SEPTEMBER: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeJJ7sB3ToupXJ-M9d1Hy36-JTqxTfVzbhva3oXGOymjZEO-A/viewform

We welcome you to join our questionnaire, share it with your friends, and contribute to the important project devoted to cultural and natural heritage! We will share the final results with you afterward. OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 - Deutschland

[edit]

Hallo FlocciNivis,

Sieger 2023 – Marksburg im Winter

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2024 findet zum 14. Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Rolf Kranz mit einer Winteransicht der Marksburg und der Schornsteine der Blei- und Silberhütte Braubach gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2023 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel in Schenkenzell in Baden-Württemberg oder in Oyten in Niedersachsen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Bilder zum Thema „Kinderwelten“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Bauwerken, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind. Dieser Sonderpreis wird gemeinsam mit dem Klexikon vergeben.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 
Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang November tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 17:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20180616 Graffiti Saarbrücken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bonus Person (talk) 20:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200912 Predigerhaus Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220507 BMW Tower 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220808 Baumkronenpfad Beelitz-Heilstätten 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221007 Siegestor 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230409 St. Lorenz Oberföhring 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230603 Bundesautobahn 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240819 Tegeler Hafenbrücke 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221115 Fußgängertunnel Ungererstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230122 Feldherrnhalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230518 Burg Wasserburg Wasserburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:16, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221115 Fußgängertunnel Ungererstraße 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240511 Badepilz Fischbachbad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The edge of the wheel is never in sharp focus. --Ptrump16 16:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good enough for me --Jakubhal 17:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230410 Wehr Isarkaimauern in Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ptrump16 16:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240517 St. Josef Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks unnatural. Adjust curves and it'll be much better. --Ptrump16 16:06, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Vote of a confirmed sockpuppet crossed out --Jakubhal 19:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing wrong with perspective, but the photo is a bit too bright for me, especially the sky. Can the brightness be dialed down? --Jakubhal 17:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I adjusted the brightness now --FlocciNivis 18:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you, good quality. --Jakubhal 19:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221108 Munich Westfriedhof 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ptrump16 05:45, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230212 Schaiblingsturm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200725 Versöhnungskirche Völklingen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200725 Versöhnungskirche Völklingen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20200906 St. Jakob Aachen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 10:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230107 St. Bartholomäus Nürnberg-Wöhrd 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240407 Kraftwerk Mühltal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 09:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240517 Flood Saarland 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240517 Flood Saarland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240819 Borsigtor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Pity about the location of the lamp post but good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230318 Kannengießerbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230608 Partnach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230701 St. Nikolaus Peiß 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side is leaning out (look at the Building in the far left) --Poco a poco 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 14:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240514 Blast furnace office Völklingen Ironworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240815 Sprung über die Spree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240329 Kirchenstraße München 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is ok but it needs a more specific cat --Poco a poco 15:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment After asking at Portal München I could add some probable information. If this is not enough, I would ask you to just leave this nomination without declining it. I would like to resubmit it in the future, when I have more information --FlocciNivis 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok, I helped with a few more cats, I hope they are right --Poco a poco 17:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20221016 Pfarrkirche St. Georg Ulm 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Quality images. --Sebring12Hrs 00:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20211029 Ludwigspark Malstatt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230311 Ensemble Brauerei Becker 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230313 Weingut Neus in Ober-Ingelheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240511 Bergehalde Grühlingstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240517 Flood Saarland 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240407 Zentralländstraße 35 München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240120 Entenfallweiher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230320 Pauluskirche Hannover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240704 Centaurea jacea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 19:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240517 Zentraler Kommunaler Entsorgungsbetrieb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 19:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230410 Deutsches Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gut, gut --PantheraLeo1359531 18:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230409 St. Lorenz Oberföhring 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230216 Grenzstein 26 Mühldorf am Inn Süd 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230304 Herzog-Heinrich-Brücke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230311 Alte Schmelz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 16:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240407 Großhesselohe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20220608 Plebejus idas 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230131 Munich Waldfriedhof 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230311 Ensemble Brauerei Becker 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230216 St. Nikolaus Mühldorf am Inn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230314 Ludwigsstraße 1 Mainz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:20, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230212 Schaiblingsturm 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 15:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230318 Stilwerkbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230312 Sulzbach Saar 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240517 Wilhelm-Meyer-Brücke Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality is good-. Coordinates would be fine. --Milseburg 18:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I added coordinates --FlocciNivis 10:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)  Support I suggest always specifying the coordinates for stationary motifs.--Milseburg 12:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240816 Bahnhof Berlin Priesterweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240513 St. Katharina Bübingen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Bit too noisy. Fixable? --Alexander-93 19:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I performed noise reduction now on the image --FlocciNivis 20:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240510 Schanzenbergbrücke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 12:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)~
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230216 Kronwidlkapelle Ecksberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230311 Möllerhalle Alte Schmelz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 14:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230131 Munich Waldfriedhof 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 15:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230131 Munich Waldfriedhof 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 15:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230409 St. Lorenz Oberföhring 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think there could be a little more contrast. Otherwise good. --Benjism89 19:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I increased the contrast --FlocciNivis 10:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok now. --Benjism89 18:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230105 St.-Johannis-Kirche Würzburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20230131 Munich Waldfriedhof 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240819 Humboldtmühlenbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 17:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240815 Haus der Bundespressekonferenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240512 Campus Saarland University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240510 Schanzenbergbrücke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20240815 Cube Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20241003 Bâtiment voyageur de la gare de Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]