User talk:ChNPP

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ChNPP!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot (talk) 22:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flammrohrrauchrohrkessel.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Flammrohrrauchrohrkessel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flammrohrrauchrohrkessel.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Flammrohrrauchrohrkessel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.147.94.195 14:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Calderas

Thanks !!! The original is really horrible, hehe. Yrithinnd (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello ChNPP, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Logo Therme Bad Steben.PNG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 21:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RBMK_Reaktorhallenaufbau.PNG

File:RBMK_Reaktorhallenaufbau.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-<(kmk)>- (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RBMK_Reaktorhallenaufbau_en.PNG

File:RBMK_Reaktorhallenaufbau_en.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-<(kmk)>- (talk) 22:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RBMK-1500_Beschriftet_en.PNG

File:RBMK-1500_Beschriftet_en.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-<(kmk)>- (talk) 22:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RBMK-1500_Kostroma.PNG

File:RBMK-1500_Kostroma.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-<(kmk)>- (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MKER_Beschriftet_en.PNG

File:MKER_Beschriftet_en.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-<(kmk)>- (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABWR.PNG

File:ABWR.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-<(kmk)>- (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gleismesszug1.JPG

File:Gleismesszug1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--77.23.221.227 13:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 62dad27b9b0d63506c3f4f5d1c3e64a7

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Uploading "Retouched" versions

Hello. I have noticed that you upload quite some digitally altered (i.e. to make it look better) files which you obtained from existing files from Commons. Please note that if it is, without doubts, a simple colour/quality edit, you could simply click the "Upload a new version of this file" button to upload instead. The helps preserve the original file sources/uploaders and original page history. Thank you. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 10:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rehman, i understand it, but the image of the RBMK-Reactor at Ignalina is not the same than File:RBMK reactor from Ignalina ArM.jpg. ArM's Reactor has wrong colors, and this is an important Detail of this image. Thats the different controlrods, any rod have a different color and a different function. At ArM's image, you can not see the right colors. Regards ChNPP (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake on RBMK-Reactor page. Kind regards. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 00:54, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 09:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:VogtleCoolingTowers.jpg

Hallo ChNPP! Deine Bearbeitung ist nun hier: File:VogtleCoolingTowers-2.jpg. Ich hatte auch schon eine erstellt, nur noch nicht hochgeladen (File:VogtleCoolingTowers-3.jpg) und deine erst nach meinem Upload entdeckt. Ich finde, dass du zu aggressiv herangegangen bist. Die dunklen und hellen Bereiche sind nicht mehr erkennbar. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Saibo, joa das war nur auf die schnelle gemacht. Eigentlich wollte ich auch nicht die Datei überschreiben, doch der Nutzer einen Abschnitt weiter oben hatte bemängelt, dass ich immer meine überarbeiteten Versionen als neue Datei unter anderem namen hochgeladen habe. Nagut, so sollte alles stimmen ;-). Das war sowieso mein erster Versuch mit Photoshop das bild zu verbessern, bin mit dem Programm noch nicht so vertraut. Hatte das immer zuvor mit GIMP gemacht, ich denke dabei bleibe ich auch vorerst, da die Ergebnisse besser ausfallen. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo ChNPP, zum Dateiiüberschreiben oder nicht gibt es leider nicht die Wahrheit und beste Lösung. Beides hat Vor- und Nachteile (wenn die sie noch nicht kennst und wissen willst, sage Bescheid). Ich wollte auch gar nicht sagen, dass du sie Originaldatei nicht überschreiben solltest. Nur, um verschiedene Bearbeitungen zu vergleichen, ist eben ein Upload als extra Datei am Besten.

Ich habe noch nie mit Photoshop gearbeitet - von dem Funktionsumfang und den Möglichkeiten ist es aber, glaube ich, das mächtigere Programm. Die Ergebnisse sollten, bei richtiger Bedienung, mindestens genauso gut sein, wie mit GIMP. Da ich aber Open-Source-Software liebe, mit Linux arbeite und kein Geld für PS ausgeben möchte, arbeite ich natürlich mit GIMP. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 15:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nagut, dann lade ich zukünftig wieder meine Dateien unter einen separaten Namen hoch, denke das ist auch besser, aber ich bleibe nun eindeutig beim GIMP, Photoshop hat mir wirklich viel zu viele Funktionen. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:VAE aiksteliu fotomontazas de.png

File:VAE aiksteliu fotomontazas de.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:VAE aiksteliu fotomontazas en.png

File:VAE aiksteliu fotomontazas en.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, danke, wusste ich nicht, dass die geklaut waren, hatte eigentlich den User vertraut, der die litauische Erstversion Hochgeladen hatte. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 21:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian NPPs

The great thanks for descriptions of fotos Balakovo NPP and Novovoronezh NPP II. You very much have helped me. I little correct this. Hullernuc (talk) 16:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hullernuc, thats no problem. Your correction is okay, becase i hope you know, that CASTOR stands for „cask for storage and transport of radioactive material“. This is the detailes form of Trnsport Container ;). Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 16:42, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

difference in «spent» or «new» fuel. On foto new. Hullernuc (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again thanks for help. Hullernuc (talk) 18:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, thats not new fuel. New fuel is transported in blue tubes, two form a pair. These Transport-Containers are very expensiv, and the radioactivity is very low, because the fuel was not already critically. So it don't needed to use such containsers. An by the way, the Containers on this image was build in germany. The containers were producted by the GNS and Siempelkamp. I think you must know this, because your russian user-site call to me, you work at a nuclear power station!? At which power plant? Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right Dirk, I'm get wrong. You very competent, I'm gratefully surprise! From where you know all this? I'm work on Balakovo NPP. Hullernuc (talk) 16:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hullernuc, not many people has tell this to me :D. I know this because russian nuclear technology is my "Hobby". What's your job at Balakovo? I find this very interesting. Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 17:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hobby its good, but its very extraordinary hobby i think :), and it is stranger that you prosperous in this hobby :). I think you very intelligent guy.

I'm work as the advanced engineer on control of reactor, not too long. After institute I'm worked as operator on reactor compartment, senior operator, engineer, and now advanced engineer. Hullernuc (talk) 20:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's very extraordinary :D, but i'm not the only. I know many other people who has nuclear power as hobby too. It's very interesting your job! My personal knowledge about VVER's is not very good. In the last years (since some 8 years) I employed mainly the RBMK-technology. The knowledge of VVER-Plants is very low, compared to RBMK-Plants. Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 21:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dirk, I have a question for you. May you deteriorate [this http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BalakovoNPP_over.jpg foto] to size of preview (800 × 532 pixels). Long to explain for what. Please help. Hullernuc (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hmm.. You can easy resize the image at paint. Open paint, instert the image (important: Don't opened the file directly with paint). So you see now a dashed border around the image. Click now on the right key on your mouse and resize the image to the size you want to have. But I don't touch this pictures. OTRS-Requestet images is not good to edit in big dimensions, but i don't understand, why you would resize the image!? Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 17:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too detailed. Not good. Hullernuc (talk) 18:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm resize, old version is will be accessible too? Hullernuc (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not good? Thats great, the image is very good to cut details of the plant and upload this as second file. And Yes, the image will be accessible too. The important detail: The Internet never forgets. Not in all events, but in this case. Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 19:41, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To get a 800 pixel version just save [1]. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:On Wikipedia

@Category:Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant‎ Hallo ChNPP, das Template sieht sehr unübersichtlich aus. Ich mag es nicht und verwende es nie. Auch geht das iw-Updaten mit dem Template nicht so einfach, wie mit iws. Von mir aus verwende es - aber ich finde es nicht sinnvoll. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 13:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Saibo, ich sehe das eigentlich ähnlich, auch wenn ich sie verwende! :-D Allerdings ist das prinzipielle Problem, dass einige Kategorien auch Interwikis zu Kategorien besitzen. Beispielsweise gibt es für das Kernkraftwerk Nowoworonesch in der russischen Wikipedia eine eigene Kategorie (für was auch immer...), weshalb jetzt ein Interwiki auf den Artikel Nowoworonesch in allen anderen Sprachen außer der Russischen, weil man dort wieder auf die Kategorie verweisen muss, zur Verwirrung führen kann. Damit das nicht passiert, verwende ich diese Vorlage, im Fall Fukushima besonders, dadurch ich nicht weiß, ob vielleicht nicht in anderen Wikipedias mehr als nur ein Artikel entsteht, und diese dann in eine Kategorie "Kernkraftwerk Fukushima" o.ä. reinverfrachtet werden. Ist nur Freihalten von möglichen interwikis und keine Panik, bisher habe ich von mir eingefügte Vorlagen immer selbst regelmäßig gewartet, in dem Fall auch, wird keine Mehrarbeit für andere anfallen. ;-) Beste Grüße ChNPP (talk) 12:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo ChNPP, verzeihe bitte, aber mein erster Gedanke nach dem Lesen deines ersten Satzes hier war: OMG. ;-)

Was spricht denn dagegen es so wie in Category:Sat.1 zu machen? Wenn Kat. vorhanden, dann jene, ansonsten, wenn vorhanden, Artikel. "Deine" Vorlage ist unübersichtlich, riesig und.. bääh! ;)

Ich weiß, eigentlich sollte das möglichst zentral geregelt sein, ist es aber meines Wissens nach nicht wirklich. Bzw die Regelung ist AFAIK, dass Kategorien per IWs verlinkt werden. Das geht aber ja völlig an der Praxis vorbei - somit ist es nur noch eine Reglung auf dem "Papier". Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, das finde ich persönlich noch unübersichtlicher ^^, allerdings weiß ich nicht wie das dort behandelt wird, ich bleibe lieber in meinem Kraftwerks/Kernenergie-Themenbereich ^^. Is eigentlich ähnlich wie in der de-wikipedia, so grundsätzliche Abmachungen, die nicht wirklich festgeschrieben wurden, ich verweise beispielsweise auf de:Portal:Kernenergie/Leitlinien ;) Naja, man kann sich ja in Einzelfällen auch zur Not, wenn dieses Thema wirklich so wichtig ist, auf eine Lösung einigen ^^. Prinzipiell ist mir das weniger wichtig, ich verwalte in Kategorien und bei Gallerien lediglich und will niemanden etwas streitig machen, sofern es nicht meine eigenen Werke in bestimmter Form betrifft ;) Beste Grüße ChNPP (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, vieles sollte eigentlich einheitlich geregelt sein, ist es aber nicht. Wenn du meine Argumente nicht nachvollziehn kannst, dann machen wir es in Sat.1 eben so und in Fukushima so. ;-) Mach's gut und viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:16, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist aber keine Lösung zu sagen, ich will es anders, wenn du es nicht verstehst, dann machen wir das trotzdem so! :-D Ich kann deine Argumente schon nachvollziehen, allerdings halte ich die Verlinkung von Artikeln in Kategorien weiterhin für eigentlich unangemessen. In der Wikipedia ist es auch nicht gang und gebe, wenn es beispielsweise keinen Interwiki auf die russische Kategorie Sat.1 gibt einen Interwiki auf den dortigen Artikel zu machen. Ich fände es als Nutzer ziemlich verwirrend, weshalb ich selbst ja versuche, wenn ich so etwas vorfinde, zu beheben. Also ich bleibe dagegen, das zu ändern wie in der von dir angeführten Kategorie. Für mich pers. viel zu unübersichtlich. Könnte man eine Trennung links in der Leiste machen, sprich vielleicht eine Vorlage die eine extra Leiste links unter den Kategorie-Interwikis macht zu den Artikel-Interwikis wäre es etwas anderes, dann würde ich es befürworten, allerdings gibt es soweit ich weiß bisher noch keine solche Vorlage. Beste Grüße ChNPP (talk) 15:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich weiß, dass das keine Lösung ist. Eher halt ein Abbruch der Diskussion, da jene auf einer Benutzerdisk falsch gelagert ist. Das müsste eher in Village Pump oder auf einer anderen Funktionsseite besprochen werden (evtl. auch mit anschließender Abstimmung dort).

An den meisten Stellen ist hier der WP-Artikel verinterwikit. Da es aber eigentlich Kategorien sind, wäre es sinnvoller Kategorien zu verinterwikien. Wenn man aber nur Kategorien verinterwikit, dann sind es nur weniger oder gar keine Interwikis und außerdem ist es konträr zum Üblichen hier. Also habe ich beides bei Sat.1 versucht zu verbinden. Ja, wird brauchen eine Softwarelösung dafür - eigentlich keine Vorlage. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eine Softwarelösung wäre mehr als Einfach, das kann ich als Wiki-Betreiber, der gerne auch mal mehr in den php-dateien als am Wiki selbst schreibt, eindeutig sagen. Weshalb da noch niemand drauf gekommen ist, wäre eine andere Frage. Man müsste es mal vorschlagen, zumindest für Commons oder eine Erweiterung schreiben. Wenn ich jetzt wüsste wie ich mit einer Vorlage links auf die Leiste springen könnte, würde ich da wenigstens was vorübergehendes machen, leider ist mir das doch etwas zu verzwickt. Wenn es dich innerlich befriedigt, dann ändere es wieder in der Kategorie, ich denke die Diskussion würde doch sowieso nur ins leere laufen. ;) Beste Grüße ChNPP (talk) 07:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for enhancing of image

Thank you for enhancing of image File:Kuosheng_Nuclear_Power_Plant-P1020606.JPG, I will re-shoot the image of Kuosheng Nuclear Power Plant and Chin-shan Nuclear Power Plant on a fine weather.--Ellery (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, but it's only a transitional version, a new image is really better. Best Regards ChNPP (talk) 16:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:OL3 11-2011.jpg

File:OL3 11-2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A333 (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Büste von Alexander v. Humboldt.jpg

Hallo, ich kenne mich mit der Panoramafreiheit im Detail noch nicht so ausm aber File:Büste von Alexander v. Humboldt.jpg wäre noch under Copyright, da die Büste erst 2007 erstellt wurde. Ich habe die relevanten Info auf der Diskusionsseite abgelegt, vielleicht kannst du, oder jemand der sich damit auskennt die entsprechenden Templates eintragen. Agathoclea (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gas-Brenner.jpg

File:Gas-Brenner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radioactive Black.svg

File:Radioactive Black.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Louperivois Ψ @ 21:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you have uploaded requires updating

Hi ChNPP,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed one of your uploads is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. 2A02:908:C32:ECC0:B116:2A5E:C5BD:C431 17:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC) (File:AKWs Weltkarte.png)[reply]

File:Juraguá NPP Model.jpg

File:Juraguá NPP Model.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 16:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:AKWs Weltkarte.png

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:RBMK reactor from Ignalina retouched-1.jpg

File:RBMK reactor from Ignalina retouched-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific or technical topics. If you have time, could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you. If were already informed, sorry to bother you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Susquehanna steam electric station.jpg

File:Susquehanna steam electric station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Pripyat measuring April 1986

Hi. Do you have more information about dose rate measurements made in Pripyat during 26-27 April 1986 (points 1 to 26)?. --NH35 (talk) 18:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late respone. I made this map originally for the german Nucleopedia, where I wrote a article about Pripyat. The measurements are already inside a Table here: https://de.nucleopedia.org/wiki/Pripjat . But by the way, there are even more maps here from page 19. But there are also even better maps here, from which I took the measurements out of the images on page 33 and put it in the table. But I hide this reference in the sourcecode of the article, because there are potential for additional maps for usw in Wikiedia, Nucleaopedia for uploading on Commons. but I don't have the time to draw it :(. Best regards ChNPP (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ChNPP TZV user image.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ChNPP TZV user image.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ChNPP TZV user image.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AFBorchert (talk) 13:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:ChNPP

Contents

Image:Flammrohrrauchrohrkessel.jpg

Image:Flammrohrrauchrohrkessel.jpg

Re: Calderas

Deleted content

File:RBMK_Reaktorhallenaufbau.PNG

File:RBMK_Reaktorhallenaufbau_en.PNG

File:RBMK-1500_Beschriftet_en.PNG

File:RBMK-1500_Kostroma.PNG

File:MKER_Beschriftet_en.PNG

File:ABWR.PNG

File:Gleismesszug1.JPG

TUSC token 62dad27b9b0d63506c3f4f5d1c3e64a7

Uploading "Retouched" versions

File:VogtleCoolingTowers.jpg

File:VAE aiksteliu fotomontazas de.png

File:VAE aiksteliu fotomontazas en.png

Russian NPPs

Template:On Wikipedia

Thank you for enhancing of image

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

File:OL3 11-2011.jpg

Büste von Alexander v. Humboldt.jpg

File:Gas-Brenner.jpg

File:Radioactive Black.svg

An image that you have uploaded requires updating

File:Juraguá NPP Model.jpg

Notification about possible deletion

File:RBMK reactor from Ignalina retouched-1.jpg

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition

File:Susquehanna steam electric station.jpg

Map of Pripyat measuring April 1986

File tagging File:ChNPP TZV user image.jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:ChNPP

Re: Calderas

Deleted content

TUSC token 62dad27b9b0d63506c3f4f5d1c3e64a7

Uploading "Retouched" versions

File:VogtleCoolingTowers.jpg

Russian NPPs

Template:On Wikipedia

Thank you for enhancing of image

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Büste von Alexander v. Humboldt.jpg

An image that you have uploaded requires updating

Notification about possible deletion

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition

Map of Pripyat measuring April 1986

File tagging File:ChNPP TZV user image.jpg

Navigation menu

Search