File talk:Spheres of influence.png
Help - I needed to use this image but with the spelling error needing to be fixed, I edited the image. In the spirit of Wikipedia, I wanted to share the "fixed" version but being brand new here I seem to have just uploaded a new version and have no idea how to replace the incorrect one. The edited version is here - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spheres_of_influence_new.png If someone can tell me how to remedy or just plain fix it...many thanks Jskiff (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Accuracy
[edit]
The regions outside the Chinese concessions were not under the European powers' spheres of influence. This map is an overexaggeration at best. 24630 02:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
why is there so many colors if they don't have that many countrys? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.93.127.235 (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not clear how these boundaries were drawn, or why they changed so much from the first version, to the second? Also, could we get a date on the map? presumably it's pre ww1, as germany lost its position in china early in that war. Lx 121 (talk) 09:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Mongolia, Tibet, Taiwan, and Manchuria are somewhat dubiously self-evident in how they could be considered a "sphere of influence" of a foreign power in China; however, how are the spheres in Xinjiang and China proper determined? A source needs to be given to authenticate the seemingly arbitrary boundaries of these spheres. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.155.232.178 (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Nepal was never in control of the British Rule.. The map is absolutely wrong............ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.174.95.231 (talk) 04:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
["Accuracy" discussion forwarded from en:File talk:Spheres of influence.png by Athaenara (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)]
