File talk:Palestinian territories under military control of Israel Egypt and Jordan 1949.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Open to criticism based on Primary Sourced documents, statements and resolutions. Any input in attaining a higher degree of accuracy in following the UNGA Boundaries will be appreciated and / or detailed alternative maps, accurately reflecting the 1949 Armistice Agreements ... Talknic (talk) 14:46, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The obvious one is leaving out the corpus separatum of Jerusalem -- it was part of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 plan lines, and leaving it out makes it impossible to do a full comparison between the never-implemented theoretical 1947 partition plan lines and the actual real 1949 armistice boundaries using this map. AnonMoos (talk) 04:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On what date was corpus separatum instituted ? Talknic (talk)
@Talknic: On what date were any of the internal geographical borders of the theoretical United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 plan physically implemented on the ground??? Please do tell! AnonMoos (talk) 13:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Notes on problems copied from file page

[edit]

The Latrun salient no-man's-land is currently colored all red, which is not accurate.

Also, the corpus separatum of Jerusalem-Bethlehem is not distinguished, and the area which would have belonged to the corpus separatum is currently colored as if it had been assigned to the Arab state by the plan, which is not true. -- AnonMoos (talk) 18:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Latrun is not red. It was not proclaimed by the Israeli Government in its plea for recognition as Israeli.
On what date was corpus separatum instituted, separating Jerusalem from whatever remained of Palestine after Israel officially proclaimed its borders in its official plea for recognition http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/israel/large/documents/newPDF/49.pdf  ? Talknic (talk)
Yes it is -- the image shows only a narrow zone around Latrun (clearly not including the no-man's land). My SVG map splits the Latrun salient no-man's land between Israel and West Bank, which could be considered an oversimplification, but yours shows it all under Israeli control, which is just plain flat-out wrong for the pre-1967 period. AnonMoos (talk) 13:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]