File talk:NE 600ad.jpg

Ireland

Whoever made that map doesn't know much about Ireland, calling the northern Ui Neill kingdom Ulster, While calling the Ulster/Ulaid kingdom "Uliad" and there is no Airghialla shown — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.104.160.57 (talk) 07:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Disputed map and editing conflict

The version with « Romanised Dacians » (= Olahok, Vlachs) and « Slavs » (Totok, Slavons, Slovens...) may be a romanian and slavic POV, but the other version « Only Avars and no other people north of the Danube, in the future Kingdom of Hungary », according to the Eduard Rössler's Awarenwüste theory, is an Austrian-Hungarian POV: one is not more objective than the other and unfortunately no synthesis is possible. Nihil scimus (talk) 17:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Restored a more accurate map uploaded march 15, 2023 by Moodylo333: Armenia was not Byzantine (see Claude Murafian's & Eric Van Lauwe's Atlas historique de l'Arménie, Autrement publ., ISBN 2746701006); Highlighted the boundaries of the Eastern Roman Empire, Sassanid Persia and the Göktürk Khanate; Drawn the Slavic perimeter and reduced the Avar perimeter (greatly exaggerated) according to

[1] and to Vladislav Popovic's «La descente des Koutrigours, des Slaves et des Avars vers la mer Égée» (french) in: Comptes-rendus des séances de l'Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres, Vol. 12, 1978, pp. 596-648 [2]: verify please! Characterizing historical theories that do not conform to the Hungarian point of view as false, nationalist and communist does not transform the maps consistent with the Germanic and Austro-Hungarian point of view of the 19th century, into indisputable documents. --Nihil scimus (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)