File talk:MentuhotepII.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image was nominated for deletion but kept. A copy of the debate follows:
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
seems not free, because it is newer photo of an relief and author has given no approval - Sven-steffen arndt 11:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Is the the third dimension (depth) of a relief significant enough that photographs have to be licensed separately? It seems to me this should be considered essentially equivalent to a 2D artwork, meaning that {{GFDL}} is the wrong tag, instead it should be {{PD-old}} or {{PD-art}}. Angr 12:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete, since it is a photo of a three dimensional work it is not just a reproduction but a separate work.--Wiggum 14:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to be a picture of a relief but of a mural; which I'd consider to be 2-D. So keep, I'd say
- Kept; no original authorship. / Fred Chess 13:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
