File talk:Logo NS.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

[edit]

Definitely a trademark, but as to the complexity, it's not enough. I find text that is just as complex in runes , there aren't any extra frills to the image beyond what would be required to just jot it into an ancient script. The colour used varies, so it's just the shape alone that is the subject. maybe pd-shape could be considered.

Penyulap 11:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Although this trademark may not be complex, it surely is distinct from any other symbol. Therefor it contains originality. But most important of all: it's copyrights are undeniable. EvilFreD overleg 12:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can say a white circle is copyrighted and that doesn't make it copyrighted at all. A deletion request was closed a few years ago and the image was kept, so this deletion request should be reopened if someone doesn't agree with that outcome instead of asking a speedy deletion. --B1mbo (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That was a possibilty ofcourse and I don't know why a speedy deletion was requested, but the fact is that the logo is a registerd trademark or at least a copyrighted image. The fact that a template exists that can be used to suggest that image is in the public domain doesn't make it so. Using that template only means that someone thinks the image is in the public domain. There's no proof given that is in fact in the public domain and the disclaimer on the website of the NS suggests otherwise. Until it is 100% proven that this image is in the public domain, it is not. And nobody here can be the judge of that, you need unbiased, reliable sources for that. EvilFreD overleg 17:25, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]